Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-27-2006, 02:04 AM
caz caz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 634
Default Re: ATo...um, not sure about this

I don't see how you CAN bet the river here? What do you put the two other dudes on? Good check.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2006, 07:26 AM
five4suited five4suited is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,205
Default Re: ATo...um, not sure about this

[ QUOTE ]
In my opinion, with this many people in, capping preflop with so-so offsuit big cards isn't worth the bother.

I wouldn't have raised in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

OP's statement about SH affecting his play is accurate with regard to that raise.

As for the preflop action... if we're raising or planning to raise the flop to drive players out, why would we make the pot any bigger preflop? All that does is give your opponents implied if not actual odds to call your flop raise, especially with this highly coordinated board.

The fact that all these people called 3 bets preflop is bad enough. If a small stakes pot is capped 4 or 5 ways preflop, it usually takes a turn raise to make people even think about folding.

And unless your opponents are idiots, you should be behind on the river. Maybe one had 98 and the other had Q9, but either CO or UTG (if not both) should be holding suited cards.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2006, 12:08 PM
dano dano is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 485
Default Re: ATo...um, not sure about this

I think the flop and turn are good. The check on the river is fine.

There are not enough hands that you are beating that are calling you on this river (QJ, KJ). I think you have to call a raise in this big pot, and you are going to be raised by plenty of hands (KQ, flush draws). IMO, a bet is -EV on this river.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2006, 12:42 PM
smoove smoove is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: trained wrong...as a joke
Posts: 851
Default Results

[ QUOTE ]
And unless your opponents are idiots , you should be behind on the river. Maybe one had 98 and the other had Q9, but either CO or UTG (if not both) should be holding suited cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

SB has 3s As (two pair, aces and threes).
UTG has 9d 9c (one pair, nines).
Hero has Td Ac (two pair, aces and tens).
CO has Qh Ts (one pair, tens).
Outcome: Hero wins 13.06 BB.

So here I was...ahead postflop the entire hand. I still don't feel too bad about the river check, considering the draws it appeared to complete.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2006, 12:42 PM
___ ___ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ___
Posts: 898
Default Re: ATo...um, not sure about this

[ QUOTE ]
The fact that all these people called 3 bets preflop is bad enough...

And unless your opponents are idiots, you should be behind on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]
They've already told you that they are idiots. It's an extremely common condition for small stakes villains to have.

That makes me think a river bet is slim, but profitable. Yes the A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] is a super scare card, but these are the sort of opponents who are just as likely to chase trips/two pair as being on a straight or flush draw.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-27-2006, 12:49 PM
jedi jedi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Selling cheezy poker gear.
Posts: 3,976
Default Re: Results

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And unless your opponents are idiots , you should be behind on the river. Maybe one had 98 and the other had Q9, but either CO or UTG (if not both) should be holding suited cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

SB has 3s As (two pair, aces and threes).
UTG has 9d 9c (one pair, nines).
Hero has Td Ac (two pair, aces and tens).
CO has Qh Ts (one pair, tens).
Outcome: Hero wins 13.06 BB.

So here I was...ahead postflop the entire hand. I still don't feel too bad about the river check, considering the draws it appeared to complete.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's one piece of advice that I had been hearing. I'm not too sure how good it is, but given that the one giving me advice has more experience in bigger games, it might apply.

Several people are telling you to value bet here. You were afraid of getting raised by a made flush or straight. However, You know the tendencies of the players better than we do. You said:

[ QUOTE ]
UTG was sLP-P after about 70 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

If he raises you, then you know you're beat, and can lay it down. This also implies that UTG can also read the board well enough to NOT raise his A3 which just made him a "monster" 2 pair.

CO is another story. If you be and he raises you, then you have to figure out if he's a maniac who would raise scare cards or not. If he is, then you might need to bet/call. If he's not, then it might be a bet fold (especially depending on if UTG decides to overcall).

This is a tricky spot for me, and I'm not yet good enough to play it where I can bet/fold this river. That's why I check/call it like you did.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-27-2006, 01:15 PM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: Results

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
UTG was sLP-P after about 70 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

If he raises you, then you know you're beat, and can lay it down. This also implies that UTG can also read the board well enough to NOT raise his A3 which just made him a "monster" 2 pair.


[/ QUOTE ]
This read isn't enough to fold getting at least 16:1. We only need to be ahead 6%.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.