Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-19-2006, 03:53 AM
IggyWH IggyWH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: America\'s Finest City
Posts: 8,170
Default Re: WBC

That would be fine, but how exactly would you go about picking who plays who? Doesn't seem to be a fair way even if it is completely random.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-19-2006, 04:10 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: WBC

you could base it on regionals like you do now, or simply have a committee that ranks them.

I understand why they did pool play, as that's the way it's done in the world cup, et al. it still sucks for baseball.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-19-2006, 12:58 PM
Mark L Mark L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: waffles.fm invite plz
Posts: 5,412
Default Re: WBC

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, we should just cancel all professional baseball leagues across the world and do this thing right. Every team plays 7, wait, eff that, 25 game series.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your sarcasm is misdirected. All I ask for is consistency and simplicity. The structure and tiebreakers are so convoluted that Mexico eliminated itself in its game against USA when it scored a run before the 13th. Yes, Mexico eliminated itself *by trying to win the game*

Korea is 2-1 against Japan and 6-1 overall. Japan is 4-3. Japan's in the final.

Make it simple. Make it double-elim. No tiebreakers, no rooting for other teams, etc. That way everything you do actually counts in the tournament.

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree with you. the idea for having this is pretty cool, and most of the countries were really into it. just needs some tweaking.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-19-2006, 02:24 PM
technologic technologic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: watching mussina sort of pwn
Posts: 3,055
Default Re: WBC

[ QUOTE ]
I remember Theo Epstein saying that signing Kim was a mistake and really agreeing with him. That guy really cracks under pressure or it is just extreme variance. With Arizona he blew it in big games (2 were in NY from what I rememeber), with Red Sox, and then tonight.

craig

[/ QUOTE ]

two world series games back to back in ny. so schilling and johnson had to pull heroics for game 7.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-19-2006, 04:00 PM
wisehandpoker wisehandpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: twoplustwo
Posts: 2,326
Default Re: WBC

Korea had home field advantage through the quarterfinals. I'm still impressed by their showing, but not as much as I would be otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-19-2006, 05:48 PM
jstnrgrs jstnrgrs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,840
Default Re: WBC

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, we should just cancel all professional baseball leagues across the world and do this thing right. Every team plays 7, wait, eff that, 25 game series.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your sarcasm is misdirected. All I ask for is consistency and simplicity. The structure and tiebreakers are so convoluted that Mexico eliminated itself in its game against USA when it scored a run before the 13th. Yes, Mexico eliminated itself *by trying to win the game*

Korea is 2-1 against Japan and 6-1 overall. Japan is 4-3. Japan's in the final.

Make it simple. Make it double-elim. No tiebreakers, no rooting for other teams, etc. That way everything you do actually counts in the tournament.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, double elimination wouldn't take any longer, and would better reward teams based on the results of their games. I also wouldn't mind if they went to tripple elimination, although that would take a little longer.

The current format: 39 games
Double elimination: 30 or 31 games
Triple elimination: 45, 46, or 47 games
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-19-2006, 05:52 PM
jstnrgrs jstnrgrs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,840
Default Re: WBC

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, we should just cancel all professional baseball leagues across the world and do this thing right. Every team plays 7, wait, eff that, 25 game series.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your sarcasm is misdirected. All I ask for is consistency and simplicity. The structure and tiebreakers are so convoluted that Mexico eliminated itself in its game against USA when it scored a run before the 13th. Yes, Mexico eliminated itself *by trying to win the game*

Korea is 2-1 against Japan and 6-1 overall. Japan is 4-3. Japan's in the final.

Make it simple. Make it double-elim. No tiebreakers, no rooting for other teams, etc. That way everything you do actually counts in the tournament.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, double elimination wouldn't take any longer, and would better reward teams based on the results of their games. I also wouldn't mind if they went to tripple elimination, although that would take a little longer.

The current format: 39 games
Double elimination: 30 or 31 games
Triple elimination: 45, 46, or 47 games

[/ QUOTE ]

Another crazy thought also just occured to me. How about having the MLB playoffs be in an elimination tournament like this.

Current Syatem: 24 - 41 games
Quintupple elimination : 35 - 39 games

I know everyone will hate this idea, but I think it would be awsome.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-19-2006, 05:58 PM
roundmound roundmound is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Preparing the Coronation
Posts: 1,512
Default Re: WBC

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, we should just cancel all professional baseball leagues across the world and do this thing right. Every team plays 7, wait, eff that, 25 game series.

[/ QUOTE ]



Your sarcasm is misdirected. All I ask for is consistency and simplicity. The structure and tiebreakers are so convoluted that Mexico eliminated itself in its game against USA when it scored a run before the 13th. Yes, Mexico eliminated itself *by trying to win the game*

Korea is 2-1 against Japan and 6-1 overall. Japan is 4-3. Japan's in the final.

Make it simple. Make it double-elim. No tiebreakers, no rooting for other teams, etc. That way everything you do actually counts in the tournament.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, double elimination wouldn't take any longer, and would better reward teams based on the results of their games. I also wouldn't mind if they went to tripple elimination, although that would take a little longer.

The current format: 39 games
Double elimination: 30 or 31 games
Triple elimination: 45, 46, or 47 games

[/ QUOTE ]

Another crazy thought also just occured to me. How about having the MLB playoffs be in an elimination tournament like this.

Current Syatem: 24 - 41 games
Quintupple elimination : 35 - 39 games

I know everyone will hate this idea, but I think it would be awsome.

[/ QUOTE ]

The playoffs are the result of a 162 game season, not 6 games of pool play.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.