|
|
|
|
#5
11-19-2007, 11:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: flush vs big river raise in FTP 1k
Bakes, has the villian a good knowledge of your game? Have you guys tangled before to any great degree? Is there any chance that he checks this river to you because he fully expects a bet from you a high percentage of the time?
Because if you are beat he has done something VERY unorthodox in this hand. I'm confused and we have a flush on a non paired board so like the tourney donk that I am - I would call here. 
|
|
#6
11-20-2007, 01:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: flush vs big river raise in FTP 1k
Lloyd, if he expects hero to bet the river, why do you assume he is checking to him so he can Bluff CRAI?
|
|
#7
11-19-2007, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: flush vs big river raise in FTP 1k
[ QUOTE ]
This is a bluff with the A of clubs from someone who plays too much PLO. [/ QUOTE ] no it's not, because nobody does that. I mean, it could be a donk with any of a number of dumb hands, but it's never a bluff by the naked Ac by someone playing too much PLO.
|
|
#9
11-19-2007, 11:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: flush vs big river raise in FTP 1k
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is a bluff with the A of clubs from someone who plays too much PLO. [/ QUOTE ] no it's not, because nobody does that. I mean, it could be a donk with any of a number of dumb hands, but it's never a bluff by the naked Ac by someone playing too much PLO. [/ QUOTE ] I've seen this play made three times with the naked A, twice unsucessfully, once successfully, in 10K buy-in events -- 2006 USPC at the Taj (unknown player, successful), 2006 Mandalay Bay WPT (Steve Zoine, unsuccessful), 2007 Borgata WPT (unknown player, unsuccessful). I've never seen anyone play the nut flush like this, ever, nor can I come up with a reason why anyone ever would, other than being able to see Bakes' cards. If it's not the nuts, which I refuse to believe it is, then he must feel confident he's not getting called, ergo he has the A of clubs.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
