#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
[ QUOTE ]
Horrible. [/ QUOTE ] |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
He would even call with a missed draw for a split pot imo
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
um, i really can't see a reason to keep firing here.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
omg this is spew if you 3 barrel
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
cmon obv he folds 9t jt of clubs. but too many hands in his range to make this bluff. skates is right about shoving i think since you really need to encourage an ace or pp to lay down. i think i like betting 65 like you didn't notice the stack size
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
It's marginal, but, honestly, I can't see this being profitable in the long run.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
i dont like it, turn changed nothing in the hand, he is calling a lot of the time, and given river, even a missed draw sometimes calls for the 'split pot'...
i give it up on the turn. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
eeewww...
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
Turn is bad. But don't you guys think river is okay as played?
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL triple barrel ok?
If he has an A, you are getting called, if he has a Q you are getting called. If he has nothing, you could get called.
I don't think you fold out many hands, either. I don't know much about double-triple barreling, tho this isn't a spot I'd do it even as experiment. |
|
|