Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-30-2007, 10:36 AM
xxrod17xx xxrod17xx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Grinding out the Micro\'s
Posts: 732
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

I don't have much to offer at this limit, but I don't understand the value of 3-betting here if you are going to fold to a push. Esp when your 3-bet is semi small which could induce a 4-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-30-2007, 10:41 AM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
i think if you limp minraise he might repop you and then you can make an EV+ shove since he must fold most of his range

[/ QUOTE ]

Now I think I dig that.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-30-2007, 10:45 AM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

Ok, here is why it's a horrible fold:

Let's put him on a tight range of AA/KK/QQ/AK. I think that's pretty reasonable.

Against that range, AKo has 39% equity!

You already have 25% of your stack in, horrible fold.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-30-2007, 10:51 AM
Landlord79 Landlord79 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kickin\' the Dog!
Posts: 1,366
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
for completion:

Like i said, I made it $150 and he pushed.

I tanked and ended up folding.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is a fine play, you now know exactly where you're at and you can fold and only lose the minimum (besides if you would have l/f'd.) I raise it to at least $180 here though pf. This game is over my limits though, so take my advice w/ a grain of salt.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:00 AM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, here is why it's a horrible fold:

Let's put him on a tight range of AA/KK/QQ/AK. I think that's pretty reasonable.

Against that range, AKo has 39% equity!

You already have 25% of your stack in, horrible fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

SABR:

Good chance I stand to learn something here, so let's discuss this.

I'm failing to see how 25% of my stack has anything to do with this.

I'm going to be calling 450 to win 750. So, I'm getting 1.67:1 on my money. 39% equity is about right there. So, this is about break even given the range you've provided.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:04 AM
threads13 threads13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: thread13.com
Posts: 2,681
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

I think you should either reraise less(because you think a shove is profitable or because you then give yourself room to fold) or you should reraise more to commit yourself to the hand. If you reraise a bit more you can pretty much shove any flop.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:07 AM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

Well, you need 37.5% to break even.

You're calling $450 to win $750, and the total pot will be $1200.

I believe it's an easy call not only because you are slightly +EV vs that range, but because if you fold, that's terrible for your image. If limp-reraising is part of your game, now you can no longer limp-re-raise on a bluff because people won't respect it, figuring you folded a bluff last time.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:13 AM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

1st, you said it was a "horrible fold" I don't think that's the case at all. I think it's extremely close...this is a $10 / 1.35bb "mistake". I see now that different raise sizes are much better for the 100x stacks for situations and hands like this.

2nd - The vast majority of the time I have AA or KK here. So, I'd much prefer people thinking that I do so with trash. Interestingly, this is the 1st time that I've been played back at with a lrr. (go figure) So, I'm praying he took a note that I folded my lrr to a push.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:26 AM
too eazy too eazy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: triple beam dreamin\'
Posts: 838
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]

Interestingly, this is the 1st time that I've been played back at with a lrr. (go figure) So, I'm praying he took a note that I folded my lrr to a push.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, he posts/lurks here so he probably has a couple extra notes now [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:26 AM
SABR42 SABR42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: LAGing it up
Posts: 5,155
Default Re: 600: Not Quite According to Plan with 2+2er

Ok, I over-estimated your pot-odds at first. That was my mistake. So it's not as bad as I thought at first.

But still, I don't like it because if your plan was to turn AK into a bluff (you said you planned to fold) then AK is way too strong to turn into a bluff, because it becomes a marginally +EV call once you raise and he 4-bets.

If you planned to raise/fold as a bluff I'd prefer you had something weaker that you could fold without regrets.

Once you get yourself into a marginal spot you should call, that's my stance anyway.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.