Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-23-2007, 11:27 PM
pattay pattay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: owned by all except too eazy
Posts: 781
Default Re: $1/2: Trips facing river shove vs. 2p2er

i folded
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:37 AM
Hklm8383 Hklm8383 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,062
Default Re: $1/2: Trips facing river shove vs. 2p2er

fold against blunty
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-24-2007, 01:36 AM
slik slik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 511
Default Re: $1/2: Trips facing river shove vs. 2p2er

No hand that beats you is consistent with a 2+2ers play on the flop and turn. I only consider folding if it's against a donk.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-24-2007, 01:52 AM
toymach776 toymach776 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the set mine
Posts: 324
Default Re: $1/2: Trips facing river shove vs. 2p2er

Yuck. I think that you could have folded pf in MP2.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-24-2007, 02:21 AM
Proofrock Proofrock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Etherized upon a table
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: $1/2: Trips facing river shove vs. 2p2er

[ QUOTE ]
Yuck. I think that you could have folded pf in MP2.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure, I COULD have but then I wouldn't have this interesting hand to post.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-24-2007, 02:22 AM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: $1/2: Trips facing river shove vs. 2p2er

[ QUOTE ]
No hand that beats you is consistent with a 2+2ers play on the flop and turn. I only consider folding if it's against a donk.

[/ QUOTE ]

obviously you haven't played with blunty ever
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-24-2007, 02:47 AM
slik slik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 511
Default Re: $1/2: Trips facing river shove vs. 2p2er

I guess 8c9c makes a tiny bit of sense. But can't think of anything else. But no, I have never played against blunty.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-24-2007, 04:00 PM
Proofrock Proofrock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Etherized upon a table
Posts: 1,384
Default RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

Results: I folded because I was multitabling and had no read or history with Villain and I assumed that people at $1/2 with 16/7 stats at full ring bluff shove the river so infrequently that calling was a mistake.


However, once I learned that blunty31 was a regular and a 2p2 poster this becomes a turbo-call. In fact, after reviewing the hand it should probably be a turbo-call against an unknown too.

As Effen and slik noted (and CDL as well, but without quite the same reasoning), no hand that beats me really makes sense given the action, but busted draws do make sense.

On the flop a competent player should NEVER be checking behind with an overpair, a set, straight, two pair, or probably even top pair. Flush draws, gutshots, and 88/99 are good canditates for checking behind.

When he overcalls the turn it should eliminate 88/99 and most gutshots from his range. Also, a seven should be raising on this draw-heavy board. If he foolishly slowplayed a set on the flop, then he should be raising the turn anyway. Regardless, you can pretty safely say he doesn't have a big made hand here, as they should all be raising the turn.

On the river, nothing changes -- the only worse made hand he could be value betting is KT (dubious). However, BB checked and I threw out a weak 1/2 pot bet, he can't figure me to have a 7 very often, he has a pot-sized raise left, so conditions seem perfect for bluff-shoving here.

Therefore, I'm confident I should call this river. If blunty31 wants he can chime in here for his take on it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-24-2007, 04:11 PM
effang effang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,489
Default Re: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

[ QUOTE ]
Results: I folded because I was multitabling and had no read or history with Villain and I assumed that people at $1/2 with 16/7 stats at full ring bluff shove the river so infrequently that calling was a mistake.


However, once I learned that blunty31 was a regular and a 2p2 poster this becomes a turbo-call. In fact, after reviewing the hand it should probably be a turbo-call against an unknown too.

As Effen and slik noted (and CDL as well, but without quite the same reasoning), no hand that beats me really makes sense given the action, but busted draws do make sense.

On the flop a competent player should NEVER be checking behind with an overpair, a set, straight, two pair, or probably even top pair. Flush draws, gutshots, and 88/99 are good canditates for checking behind.

When he overcalls the turn it should eliminate 88/99 and most gutshots from his range. Also, a seven should be raising on this draw-heavy board. If he foolishly slowplayed a set on the flop, then he should be raising the turn anyway. Regardless, you can pretty safely say he doesn't have a big made hand here, as they should all be raising the turn.

On the river, nothing changes -- the only worse made hand he could be value betting is KT (dubious). However, BB checked and I threw out a weak 1/2 pot bet, he can't figure me to have a 7 very often, he has a pot-sized raise left, so conditions seem perfect for bluff-shoving here.

Therefore, I'm confident I should call this river. If blunty31 wants he can chime in here for his take on it.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is all well and good, but if a 1/2 reg is bluff shoving a "protected" pot, that isn't HU on the river, then well...it's time for him to move up =).

just seems shoving into 2 players after little action on turn and river is a really crazy move, and unless he has strong reads that you can fold OP or better, it's not the best play.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-24-2007, 04:16 PM
twoblacknines twoblacknines is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lonesome Crowded West
Posts: 919
Default Re: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

I would have raised more preflop, $8 unless all your raises are $6. And I would have bet flop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.