|
|
#11
10-14-2007, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT100 No pair
that's such an important read!!!! i'd call now i think. Although more specific reads on villain could sway me
|
|
#12
10-14-2007, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT100 No pair
Whenever I call here I get pozzed by 66 or something, or they show their slowplayed J, which no good player would ever slowplay here, of course, but why do I try to attribute decent thought processes to a 33/18...
|
|
#13
10-14-2007, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT100 No pair
[ QUOTE ]
Whenever I call here I get pozzed by 66 or something, or they show their slowplayed J, which no good player would ever slowplay here, of course, but why do I try to attribute decent thought processes to a 33/18... [/ QUOTE ] I don't think such a villain would be good enough to play 66 like that on the river.
|
|
#14
10-14-2007, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT100 No pair
[ QUOTE ]
Whenever I call here I get pozzed by 66 or something, or they show their slowplayed J, which no good player would ever slowplay here, of course, but why do I try to attribute decent thought processes to a 33/18... [/ QUOTE ] That's why I wanna raise.. it seems like if I call, they have 87, if I fold, they show ace high.. I'd rather raise before I call.
|
|
#15
10-14-2007, 08:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT100 No pair
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Whenever I call here I get pozzed by 66 or something, or they show their slowplayed J, which no good player would ever slowplay here, of course, but why do I try to attribute decent thought processes to a 33/18... [/ QUOTE ] I don't think such a villain would be good enough to play 66 like that on the river. [/ QUOTE ] It doesn't have to be a 'good' player to play 66 like this, he just has to be crazy/bad enough to bet it too.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
