#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
This is fine vs this player and you def don't have to bet anywhere especially since we have NO idea what the hell his range is.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
I bet flop like always against this guy. His 3-bet calling range is probably huge. Also if you are betting the turn then I think you need to bet the river as well if he calls.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] bet at least the turn. [/ QUOTE ] for value right? [/ QUOTE ]wtf? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
I def take a stab, maybe flop, probably on the turn. His AF seems a little high not to.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
Betting the turn is absolutely horrible. Either bet flop or check it down. Both have their merits depending on what you think his range is here.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
Having a look at his fold to cbet % might be useful. I'd be more inclined to check if I've been active at the table and cbetting a lot.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
yeah, I'm thinking that our check behind on the flop with a bet on the turn shows a bluff (albeit with likely the best hand). I stab the flop, give up if called.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
this is fine imo
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
i usually bet 2 streets and then instantly regret it
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
GRUNCH:
Yeah this is fine, though i think there might be greater EV in flat-calling preflop against this particular villain. |
|
|