|
|
#11
10-10-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: USC / Stanford
[ QUOTE ]
Two things: 1. This wasn't even the biggest upset of the season (the prize there goes to App St. over Michigan in week one). [/ QUOTE ] This is hugely wrong. Everyone who watches CFB a significant amount knew AppSt could beat 33% of D-1 teams. The spread was 10 pts bigger on Stanford. Stanford had lost their prior game, at home, 42-3 to a weaker team than USC. Their QB had a seizure, and a backup who hadn't played before had to start, on the road, vs a #1 team. All the USC apologists should give up. Spread of 41-42 vs 31-32 on Mich is all you need to know. 
|
|
#12
10-10-2007, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: USC / Stanford
[ QUOTE ]
Spread of 41-42 vs 31-32 on Mich is all you need to know. [/ QUOTE ] Nothing I can say here... score (yet another) one for the man from Manhattan... me was 100% dead, dead, dead wrong on that one. Hopefully the somewhat interesting Wolfers article in that post saves my (completely non-existent) reputation somewhat [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img].
|
|
#13
10-11-2007, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: USC / Stanford
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Spread of 41-42 vs 31-32 on Mich is all you need to know. [/ QUOTE ] Nothing I can say here... score (yet another) one for the man from Manhattan... me was 100% dead, dead, dead wrong on that one. [/ QUOTE ] I said the same thing before him; do I score one too? [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
