Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-04-2007, 06:33 AM
rzk rzk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 647
Default Re: Gutshot against tough, multi-tabling TAG.

[ QUOTE ]
QT and KT got there. Thats quite a few hands if I have Ax.

[/ QUOTE ]

all right, time to bust out pokerstove...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-04-2007, 06:35 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: Gutshot against tough, multi-tabling TAG.

Ya that would be great. I am far from sure that folding Ax is correct on this river.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-04-2007, 06:53 AM
rzk rzk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 647
Default Re: Gutshot against tough, multi-tabling TAG.

ok, i tried it with two ranges for bb: one containing some Ax hands and one without (in case bb doesn't 3br with a showdownable Ax hand). i've also discounted low pp's by including only 55 and of course 22. in both cases i seem to get decent equity for AQo - more than enough to make the river call.
<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

230 games 0.005 secs 46,000 games/sec

Board: Js 9c 2s 9h Kh
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.130% 39.13% 00.00% 90 0.00 { AhQd }
Hand 1: 60.870% 60.87% 00.00% 140 0.00 { 55, 22, A8s-A5s, KJs-K9s, Ks8s, Ks7s, Ks6s, Ks5s, Ks4s, Ks3s, K2s, Q8s+, Qs7s, Qs6s, Qs5s, Qs4s, Qs3s, J6s+,

Js5s, Js4s, T8s+, Ts7s, Ts6s, 96s+, 87s, 8s6s, 7s6s, 6s5s, A9o-A5o, KJo-K9o, Q8o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
</pre><hr />

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

182 games 0.005 secs 36,400 games/sec

Board: Js 9c 2s 9h Kh
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 23.077% 23.08% 00.00% 42 0.00 { AhQd }
Hand 1: 76.923% 76.92% 00.00% 140 0.00 { 55, 22, KJs-K9s, Ks8s, Ks7s, Ks6s, Ks5s, Ks4s, Ks3s, K2s, Q8s+, Qs7s, Qs6s, Qs5s, Qs4s, Qs3s, J6s+, Js5s,

Js4s, T8s+, Ts7s, Ts6s, 96s+, 87s, 8s6s, 7s6s, 6s5s, A9o, KJo-K9o, Q8o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }
</pre><hr />
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:06 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: Gutshot against tough, multi-tabling TAG.

Ok that was more than expected.

I know its not fair to nitpick when you did all the work. But looking at the 2nd range you need A2, K2s, Q2s. I also think you need to add more pps like 66-88. Prolly a few others that missed.

That said it look like its a call even with those hands in his range.

tyvm!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:09 AM
rzk rzk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 647
Default Re: Gutshot against tough, multi-tabling TAG.

i tried to discount some of these hands you mentioned because i assumed a decent tag would assume that another decent tag wouldn't 3-barrell non-bluff weak showdownable hands. i also assumed bb would reraise 77 and 88 pf. maybe i'm wrong in some of these assumptions.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-04-2007, 07:14 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: Gutshot against tough, multi-tabling TAG.

Naah I think they should be discounted. But so should some of the weaker draws as it is not every TAG who will play them aggro.

But even adding those hands with full weight will not make this a fold. Its still quite an easy call judging from your stove.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.