Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I'm not telling you what I have yet

[stephenNUTS]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LOL
Now THIS is a retarded post.First for playing Brian HU(nice game selection),and then for asking a ridiculous question that I dont know who can answer CORRECTLY!

[/ QUOTE ]

are you really calling me retarded for playing HU when I'm not playing HU and for posting a hand that's tough instead of easy? i'm surprised you still post: you make yourself look like a moron all the time. you never get embarrassed thinking about all your past posts?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you read my 2nd post above...it will make sense FWF

If not ..then I look foward to meeting you as you requested in the other thread, at the USPC M/E Tuesday.

If I dont make it I will most DEF. be at Foxwoods next month for the entire series to discuss those posts.

~stephen feraca [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[EC10]

rbk's post is real good

[NLSoldier]

I think you have QJ and should fold, call with a flush. also, how many handed is this? i assumed it wasnt HU.

[23act]

assuming BT plays like how he prescribes in his cr vids, he won't c w/ 77 in the BB. he also doesn't c pf with sc's. 99 is a tossup. AJ he switches bet calling and raising

since he raises the flop or leads the turn with 99 like all the time it leaves.... mostly AJ and a few flushes

given his bb pf range, only hand i can think of that gets to teh river and decides to bluff might be TT?

ye i think this all makes any J a call

[Kirkrrr]

Once you check behind on the turn he pretty much knows you have nothing the majority of the time and the river is a perfect card for you to take another stab at the pot, so I'd actually give him a lot of credit here since, given how the hand played out, you'll almost never have a calling hand that you won't bet yourself if checked to... I'm def calling with a flush and probably a J as a bluff catcher.
I also think the "what minimum hands you need" is a weird question since I don't see you v-betting those hands on the river that much anyway.. I check behind 2-pair type hands on that board vs a player of aba's caliber.

Kirk

[Ansky]

[ QUOTE ]
Once you check behind on the turn he pretty much knows you have nothing the majority of the time

[/ QUOTE ]

what the hell? this is so obviously false.

[Prevaricator]

[ QUOTE ]
You obv don't have a flush and he obv knows that so this seems like a great spot to bluff or get you off a split with a J

[/ QUOTE ]

this is also obviously false.

[Kirkrrr]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Once you check behind on the turn he pretty much knows you have nothing the majority of the time

[/ QUOTE ]

what the hell? this is so obviously false.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. Every draw on the planet is on that board on the turn and one gutshot made it, so if FWF actually had a big hand I think he'd just insta pot it as "checking for deception" seems pretty atrocious... once he checks, though, he either doesn't have anything, is on a draw, or has some weak'ish hand that he's not willing to keep betting. Please explain how that is "so obviously false."

Kirk

[riverboatking]

i think you guys are interpreting the turn action wrong.
i think the fact that FWF chks behind on turn makes his hand stronger.
if he had air i think he fires again, given his turn check i would give his range to be either a big ace playing pot control or some kind of decent draw like QJdd etc...therefore i really dont think its a good spot for aba to CR bluff.

i think i would call with QJ min.
but i think he (aba)has a flush here a pretty decent %.

[Hattifnatt]

how many players and what position you opened from seems like relevant info.