BRAG: My aces are holding up.

[Micro Donk]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
beat: if you havent lost w/ AA the last 67 times, you are prob. misplaying it

[/ QUOTE ]
Please elaborate, as I fear you don't know wtf yer talking about.

I'm not open-shoving or RRAI'ing them from full stacks, so how else can I be misplaying them to WIN 67 times in a row?

[/ QUOTE ]

hes probably saying that you get too attached to AA, and there were spots you should have folded it and still won anyway.

[Komodo]

[ QUOTE ]
67 times in a row literally seems impossible to me. You run well.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not if u push all-in preflop with them and rarely get called.

[ktec]

I have 43 AA won straight atm. 10.74BB/Hand. Is that too low?

[nutsflopper]

Daliman, the regression to the mean restarts after every hand, thus nullifying the mean. This is the basis of the gambler's fallacy imo.

[CrazyJoe113]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
beat: if you havent lost w/ AA the last 67 times, you are prob. misplaying it

[/ QUOTE ]
Please elaborate, as I fear you don't know wtf yer talking about.

I'm not open-shoving or RRAI'ing them from full stacks, so how else can I be misplaying them to WIN 67 times in a row?

[/ QUOTE ]

hes probably saying that you get too attached to AA, and there were spots you should have folded it and still won anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

more so that you overbet them and force everyone out i would assume, how many of those 67 went to showdown? I could be wrong, just seems like a logical assumption.

[Micro Donk]

meh, like i said, with my 78 ive only lost once, and i never overbet them, my showdown rate is around 26%

[dotbum]

[x] gambler's fallacy

[PotentialEV]

nize

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
[x]Misusing regression to the mean

[/ QUOTE ]
Def possible.

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
Daliman, the regression to the mean restarts after every hand, thus nullifying the mean. This is the basis of the gambler's fallacy imo.

[/ QUOTE ]
What's proper term then?