Bad to be a nit at low stakes???

[TKWest]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm at 43/9/?(what's this one) and am running at 21bb/100 at micro stakes, mostly 25PLO with some 10/50 thrown in.

There are players that you definitely don't want to bluff at these stakes, but by the same token there are others you can really push around. I think it's a mistake to make assumptions based on the stakes.

There is the full cross section of players at these levels, just with lesser BR and lesser skill and experience.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this for 6max for Full ring?

[thisnamedoesntfi]

That was for 6 max.

I'm 36/5/?(still don't know what this is help me out) at 50PLO FR but that is only just over 1K hands. 40/6/? over 2k hands at 25PLO FR.

These FR numbers might be a bit skewed to the loose passive side because of some bonus clearing I was doing on sites where you need to see flops to get points.

[Silent A]

It's post flop aggression factor.

[darkcore]

@thisnamedoesntfi
the third is usually the postflop-aggression. btw, your samplesize is a bit small (only ~3k hands, but if your style works for you, keep it going.

@topic
i think 20/7/3 is not really optimal, but it is a very good starting point for beginners. and when you start to learn a new form of poker or regroup in a downswing nitty play is never that wrong.

[thisnamedoesntfi]

My sample size is over 10K hands, it's 3k at FR, and as I said those stats will be somewhat skewed imo.

Thanks for the info on the third number.FWIW my post flop AF is about 1.9 on the FR and 2.4 on 6 max tables.

I'm not suggesting what I have done in these 10K hands is optimal. I have played a lot of sub optimal poker in that sample. Fortunately I'm playing against people who often make expensive mistakes in my favor.