Question about Restealing

[EasilyFound]

[ QUOTE ]
In the Small Stakes MTT, the "Anthology of Wisdom of MTTs" has two links regarding re-steals:

These are :
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...533&page=0

and

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...101&page=0

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. I'll also check out the other thread with the hand history. But does the strategy for stealing/restealing in a MTT apply equally for a STT?

[blackize]

[ QUOTE ]
But does the strategy for stealing/restealing in a MTT apply equally for a STT?

[/ QUOTE ]

No

[donkeykong2]

i think it suckez as almost no one folds ever at least at levels around 30$. a lot of them dont know icm and just think, i m getting too good odds to call and call.

[drzen]

[ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't trust anything that vers says.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[RexWoo]

The restealing article is good and interesting.

So is the book imo, even if it could have been better, as always.

[Insty]

At the levels at which anyone who is interested to the answer to this question plays, you should never resteal.

You never have enough Fold Equity.
The stacks are not deep enough.
Villains think Q9 is the nuts.

[drzen]

[ QUOTE ]
The restealing article is good and interesting.

So is the book imo, even if it could have been better, as always.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the book has quite a bit to offer lower-level players but the sng bible has yet to be written.

[EasilyFound]

In books like Moshman's and Harrington's, where they have examples of hands to play, and list stack sizes for each player at the start of the hand, for a person who is in the blind, is the stack size noted the stack size after the blind has been posted? I assume it is, but want to be sure.

[sence25]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would trust anything that vers says.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP