#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - KK OOP versus nit
[ QUOTE ]
b/f turn. If he calls and river is a blank, b/f river. [/ QUOTE ] bad |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - KK OOP versus nit
C/c turn is fine too.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - KK OOP versus nit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] b/f turn. If he calls and river is a blank, b/f river. [/ QUOTE ] bad [/ QUOTE ] why? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - KK OOP versus nit
ch/f turn is gross. I'd bet fold or call/call.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - KK OOP versus nit
I don't like it either.
Do you mean c/c both turn and river? Why prefer this over c/f river? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL - KK OOP versus nit
I prefer bet/folding, but if we're going to check its not to fold. Nits love to make stupid bluffs when we show weakness..esp on a card that completes an obvious draw.
|
|
|