Cinci @ Sea -3

[psuasskicker]

[ QUOTE ]
Bengals d is only "stopping" people when they create turnovers,

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't fool yourself into thinking the Bengals "created" turnovers in that Ravens game. The Ravens gave the Bengals the ball in 5 of those 6 turnovers.

Anyone like the u50+ here? I'm hoping public money moves it to 52 or so before game time tomorrow, at which point I'm very likely on the under for a unit.

- C -

[ervinsm46o]

im not fooling myself into thinking they were the sole catalysts in "creating turnovers".....i Know the bengals were really lucky in that game...My friends and i all laughed about how it seemed like every break went our way for the first time in a long time

I did note ogden missed most of the game, and that was a big factor in getting pressure on mcnair...ahmad brooks is a talented physical freak, but hes undisciplined, and he didnt play against cleveland either

[siccjay]

[ QUOTE ]
Bengals +3, Easy Money.

[/ QUOTE ]

o rly?

[zOrO2k6]

yeah

[New001]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't have a play on the spread but I do have a unit on the Cincinnati ML at +170.

[/ QUOTE ]
I feel robbed. I suppose it's just getting me back for Toledo, et al last night.

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[NajdorfDefense]

And....Vegas nails another one.

Pooooosh!