#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl with KK
if youre gonna bet, bet like 25, hes not calling 35 without an ace. If you've been caught bluffing and are playing lag, it's not bad to check behind to show you can have a hand.
Has anyone ever caught someone on 100/200nl check raise river AI as a bluff? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl with KK
Once.. But I keep calling every single one of them [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Its almost my trademark. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl with KK
OP-- as played, I don't think your line is horribly weak. I think a lot of you are disregarding the most important statistic to this hand: the 25%WTSD statistic. IMO, villain isn't a huge calling station who will call with anything you beat here (KJ, etc.).
I like OP's line, but if I bet, I keep it at half-pot. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl with KK
more on flop
more on turn bet river |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl with KK
oh, i misread the hand, didnt recognise the kicker was irrelevant now for top pair as the board has a pair and an ace. probably a bet then.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl with KK
bet the river
|
|
|