Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:30 AM
KCrow KCrow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 385
Default Re: 50nl: Bad stack off with bottom set?

Bet the flop, a check raise looks so strong on that board. If the villain has any sense he'll fold TP. You're most likely to be ahead so get your moneys in now, and hope for a raise from anyone with Ax etc. As played I'd happily stack off here.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:28 PM
hoyasnaxa hoyasnaxa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,054
Default Re: 50nl: Bad stack off with bottom set?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I went for what felt like 80k hands without set over

[/ QUOTE ]

wow
enjoy upcoming variance );

[/ QUOTE ]

yea how is this possible? I honestly think the majority of the time I hit a set someone else also hits one, not necessarily higher but hits one.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:44 PM
Axehero Axehero is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 29
Default Re: 50nl: Bad stack off with bottom set?

[ QUOTE ]
Bet the flop, a check raise looks so strong on that board. If the villain has any sense he'll fold TP. You're most likely to be ahead so get your moneys in now, and hope for a raise from anyone with Ax etc. As played I'd happily stack off here.

[/ QUOTE ]


I also would bet the flop, there r good chances that u get paid off by AQ AK..wouldnt check that flop [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:47 PM
AFCBeer AFCBeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Default Re: 50nl: Bad stack off with bottom set?

I think this is a good spot to lead with a set. Three roughly 2/3 pot size bets will leave you all in by the showdown. Anyone with a decent ace will find it very hard to lay down here because without any raises going in he learns very little infomation about your hand. Obviously if he raises himself then jackpot [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

By checking a street you make it far more difficult to to get stacks in without a raise going in. And when a raise goes in you are representing a big hand and possibly give villain a chance to escape from his ace.

If set over set happens then hard luck. On ace high flops especially a low set is good 99% of the time when stack go in.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-19-2007, 08:25 PM
ryang ryang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: blowing treez
Posts: 900
Default Re: 50nl: Bad stack off with bottom set?

[ QUOTE ]
you don't have bottom set. i bet the flop cause you're getting paid by AK here. this is not a spot to fold 555. ever.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-19-2007, 08:32 PM
Brian O'Nolan Brian O'Nolan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 484
Default Re: 50nl: Bad stack off with bottom set?

[ QUOTE ]
yea how is this possible? I honestly think the majority of the time I hit a set someone else also hits one, not necessarily higher but hits one.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's because most of the time you flop a set, cbet, and get no action... you usually only get action in uNL when someone else has a big hand/draw, so those are the hands you remember.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.