|
|
#11
09-19-2007, 07:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think this is the guy who told me at the WSOP that he preferred 579J to 789T, because there are more ways to fill the gaps. [/ QUOTE ] 579J can flop 14-out straight draws and 789T can't. [/ QUOTE ] Flop comes 68J, 789T makes a 17 card straight draw. [/ QUOTE ] this is completely irrelevant to my assertion. 
|
|
#12
09-19-2007, 07:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think this is the guy who told me at the WSOP that he preferred 579J to 789T, because there are more ways to fill the gaps. [/ QUOTE ] 579J can flop 14-out straight draws and 789T can't. [/ QUOTE ] Flop comes 68J, 789T makes a 17 card straight draw. [/ QUOTE ] I got pwned [/ QUOTE ] FYP
|
|
#13
09-19-2007, 07:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think this is the guy who told me at the WSOP that he preferred 579J to 789T, because there are more ways to fill the gaps. [/ QUOTE ] 579J can flop 14-out straight draws and 789T can't. [/ QUOTE ] Flop comes 68J, 789T makes a 17 card straight draw. [/ QUOTE ] I got pwned [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] *whoosh*
|
|
#14
09-19-2007, 07:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
Maybe David Grey said this because at the level he is playing there aren't as many fish who will call with second nuts.
|
|
#15
09-19-2007, 08:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think this is the guy who told me at the WSOP that he preferred 579J to 789T, because there are more ways to fill the gaps. [/ QUOTE ] 579J can flop 14-out straight draws and 789T can't. [/ QUOTE ] Flop comes 68J, 789T makes a 17 card straight draw. [/ QUOTE ] I got pwned [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] *whoosh* [/ QUOTE ] *whoosh* indeed, right over your head. You got levelled twice in one thread, well done.
|
|
#18
09-19-2007, 09:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Maybe David Grey said this because at the level he is playing there aren't as many fish who will call with second nuts. [/ QUOTE ] But he isn't playing at any level for Omaha, he said that himself.
|
|
#19
09-19-2007, 09:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
I think his opinions are as they is because he is generally extremely nitty in every game he plays and I don't think he is the kind of player who could make a largish score in a game unless he makes a lot of hands. ie. he doesn't bluff nearly enough. And for his nut-peddling style his comments are quite right because money does go in 60/40 a lot of the time in omaha.
But then again he isn't an expert in omaha so he can't really say what an expert in omaha would or should do. LAG > TAG in deep stacked omaha no question about it.
|
|
#20
09-19-2007, 11:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Conversation with David Grey about PLO
he actually did make a comment that he was in fact an expert at the game
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
