|
|
#11
09-19-2007, 10:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: STAT POST: my first 10k hands at 1/2
I don't doubt that most players experience that. I just wanted to share my experience of not experince that shift in AF so far. My AF has always been around 1.6-1.8.
Edit: Thought of this while making panncakes and it could be that because my natural style is somewhat passive and I always been something of SD-monkey, my game is better suited to the games at the games above 1/2. In retrospective since my WR has been pretty constant moving from 0.5/1 to 3/6 it indicates that I didn't crush those microgames the way I could. If my WR will keep staying constant if I move up further it sure would be great! BTW Anyone know what kind of AF does most winning highstakes players have? 
|
|
#12
09-19-2007, 11:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STAT POST: my first 10k hands at 1/2
The rake is getting less of an issue as you move up though.
|
|
#13
09-19-2007, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STAT POST: my first 10k hands at 1/2
[ QUOTE ]
I don't doubt that most players experience that. I just wanted to share my experience of not experince that shift in AF so far. My AF has always been around 1.6-1.8. [/ QUOTE ] IMO the optimal AF is different depending on what style you play. If you play 30/20 an AF of 1.8 is OK even at lower stakes. If you play 24/16 an AF of 1.8 is way too low. It is my belief that playing 30/20 is a better style in 10/20 games and above and that a 24/17 style is a better style at 3/6 and below. Therefore I agree with Oink that our AF should decrease the higher stakes we play, generally speaking.
|
|
#14
09-19-2007, 01:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STAT POST: my first 10k hands at 1/2
IMO you arenīt checkraising nearly enough. I think a CR% of >2 is a must.
Checkraising often gives us the best of both worlds if our opponents are even moderately aggressive. It gives us a lot of value and we induces a lot of bluffs.
|
|
#15
09-19-2007, 09:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STAT POST: my first 10k hands at 1/2
[ QUOTE ]
One thing I am pretty sure of is: The higher the stakes the lower your AF should be. [/ QUOTE ] A stat post I made a while ago drew responses that I wasn't showing down enough and letting people bluff. This was true and I've been trying to call more. I was just raising/folding depending upon my (crappy) reads. I was 23/15/3 or so and have been trying to call more and raise less to induce some bluffs. I used to kill the micros for 7 or 8bb/100 over large sameples, but my WR has dropped to -7 or -8bb/100 for $5/10. I don't think I've adjusted well to the more aggro games at the higher small stakes.
|
|
#17
09-20-2007, 02:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: STAT POST: my first 10k hands at 1/2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't doubt that most players experience that. I just wanted to share my experience of not experince that shift in AF so far. My AF has always been around 1.6-1.8. [/ QUOTE ] IMO the optimal AF is different depending on what style you play. If you play 30/20 an AF of 1.8 is OK even at lower stakes. If you play 24/16 an AF of 1.8 is way too low. It is my belief that playing 30/20 is a better style in 10/20 games and above and that a 24/17 style is a better style at 3/6 and below. Therefore I agree with Oink that our AF should decrease the higher stakes we play, generally speaking. [/ QUOTE ] What does a 17% pf raise equate to? Is it close to the starting recommendations on beat6maxdotcom ?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
