|
|
#12
09-20-2007, 11:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canterbury Fall Classic - hotels
[ QUOTE ]
The powers-that-be at Canterbury don't want no-limit cash games, and they don't want limits higher than $30/60, because they don't want people to go broke. They can't make money off of broke people. Table games have a maximum bet of $300 (with $2 in juice). I think that the law is worded such that you can only bet $300 on the turn of a card. Of course, the cap is lifted heads-up.... [/ QUOTE ] That never made sense. With no restriction on how many rebuys one can make, how can they say they are preventing someone from going broke? Wow, a casino that cares [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Sounds like Albert Brooks speech to Gary Marshall in the movie Lost in America [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] 
|
|
#13
09-21-2007, 01:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Canterbury Fall Classic - hotels
Who does CP make more money off of--the guy who blows $1000 in one hand of $5/10 no-limit, or the guy who blows $1000 over the course of several hours of $15/30? Of course they're not going to stop people from going broke, but they'd prefer to bleed them slowly.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
