Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:50 PM
Gurravasa Gurravasa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: what used to Denmark before we beat them
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

[ QUOTE ]
my flop AF is 2.75, overall AF is 2.0...thoughts on these numbers?

you may be right from the standpoint that i love to jam flops when i get pieces of them, but this does leave me sometimes confused later in the hand, and also sometimes makes me call down without as good of hands bc the pot size is bigger

[/ QUOTE ]

Well they are highish and as you say building the pot on the flop with a mediocre or very vulnerable hand is not a good idea. And really noone respects flopagression much theese days, because many lags go nuts with draws on the flop. Therefor the foldequity your flopagression builds is not as great as you may think.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-14-2007, 07:20 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

pretty sure my flop AF is under 2 now. i'm down to 1.8/1.7/1.5 or so
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-15-2007, 10:15 AM
aceskay aceskay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 409
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

wow, those numbers seem rather low miles, not that i'm being critical, just surprised at those numbers.

with that in mind, do you think the info posted in Wookie's 6-Max Stats Thread is out of date?

He recommends 2.5-3.5 on the flop and 1.5-2.5 on the river.

Just curious
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-15-2007, 10:20 AM
sharpie sharpie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35/25.2
Posts: 7,314
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

If you don't mind me asking, what's your wtsd dyson? Seems you have a similar style to ILP now. Spydog also had numbers like that IIRC.

aces, 2.5-3.5 seems a bit high for the flop, it's possible he wasn't peeling enough or playing too raise/fold at the time. I think anything over 2 is too high on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-15-2007, 10:39 AM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

[ QUOTE ]
wow, those numbers seem rather low miles, not that i'm being critical, just surprised at those numbers.

with that in mind, do you think the info posted in Wookie's 6-Max Stats Thread is out of date?

He recommends 2.5-3.5 on the flop and 1.5-2.5 on the river.

Just curious

[/ QUOTE ]


miles has joined the team

c/c for the win
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:20 AM
mvoss mvoss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: basically right
Posts: 1,767
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

[ QUOTE ]
wow, those numbers seem rather low miles, not that i'm being critical, just surprised at those numbers.

with that in mind, do you think the info posted in Wookie's 6-Max Stats Thread is out of date?

He recommends 2.5-3.5 on the flop and 1.5-2.5 on the river.

Just curious

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the games has gotten a lot more aggressive abd Wookies post is getting somewhat outdated. There is A TON of money to be made by letting people bluff at you making passive lines better.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-15-2007, 10:34 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

[ QUOTE ]
wow, those numbers seem rather low miles, not that i'm being critical, just surprised at those numbers.

with that in mind, do you think the info posted in Wookie's 6-Max Stats Thread is out of date?

He recommends 2.5-3.5 on the flop and 1.5-2.5 on the river.

Just curious

[/ QUOTE ]
those are probably fine for 1/2 or so. and i see winners with a wide range of AFs. i don't put too much weight into the stats. i have a weird mentality though. while everyone else worried about getting their AF up to about 2.5, my goal was getting it as low as possible while still finding ways to bet all my good stuff. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
If you don't mind me asking, what's your wtsd dyson? Seems you have a similar style to ILP now. Spydog also had numbers like that IIRC.

[/ QUOTE ]
wtsd of 36-37.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-18-2007, 04:12 PM
Gurravasa Gurravasa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: what used to Denmark before we beat them
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

Had another winning day with 5BB/100 hands over 1500 hands. My AF? PF-1,27 Flop-1,55 Turn-1,61 River-1,49 Total-1,44.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-18-2007, 04:23 PM
Scary_Tiger Scary_Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,590
Default Re: blind v. blind hand

Raising flop is fine, raising turn is fine, calling all three streets is fine.

Folding is not cool guys.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.