KT 3 streets cross posted

[sightless]

I like this river value bet vs the right opponent. I would just bet less on river around half pot so he would call us wiht a lot more hands

[traz]

I thought the same thing as well Sightless. If I were to be this river, it'd probably be $45. Just psychologically speaking, I think this is more likely to get a call from weaker hands, but it's not really a big deal

[Peter Harris]

[ QUOTE ]
I thought the same thing as well Sightless. If I were to be this river, it'd probably be $45. Just psychologically speaking, I think this is more likely to get a call from weaker hands, but it's not really a big deal

[/ QUOTE ]

The difference in % calling $45 and % calling $55 is likely negligible in an $83 pot. Why not maximize?

[huhwhatyousay?]

Looks pretty good. r:{Tx,7x,99-88}, and maybe r:{5x,44-22} will look you up here. I'd bet $22 on the turn and $42-$48 on the river vs. this villain, but that's just personal preference.

[BetweenTheLines]

[ QUOTE ]
Lego,
And yeah, its an easy b/f all around.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seems like I have to valuebet more often, I understand the
bet/fold logic,but if we play against those loose passive
callingstations (AF 0-1) do they allways reraise with hands
which us beat?In those spots I'm allways afraid to bet 3 streets because I think that they like to call down even with hands like flushs or 2pairs because they are so passive.In your experience do they allways wake up when they have something big?

[orange]

ama,
my range for villan is:

worse Ts, combos on the turn like 78 or a pair turned FD, obv stuff that beat me like 98/64/sometimes higher 2p like T7, underpairs like 88.