$25/$50 live: I merge my range on the river

[Unknown Soldier]

cearly a gimmick, come on msnl

[blah]

just thought it was funny since I just found the article yesterday through nvg.

[iceman5]

How do you figure that you are repping a straight or flush? You might have a straight or flush here of course, but "repping it" normally means betting when the flush or straight hits....not betting a draw and betting again when the draw hits.

Looks to me like your repping TP or a bluff. I would put you on TP like 80% of the time here. Maybe 44 now and then.

[carol-ann]

[ QUOTE ]
How do you figure that you are repping a straight or flush? You might have a straight or flush here of course, but "repping it" normally means betting when the flush or straight hits....not betting a draw and betting again when the draw hits.

[/ QUOTE ]I think betting draws is fairly common; I do it all the time. When one of the draws hits then betting big reps having had the draw while betting smaller reps being scared of the draw and having another made hand. At least commonly, among donks and TAGfish that is.

[ QUOTE ]
Looks to me like your repping TP or a bluff. I would put you on TP like 80% of the time here. Maybe 44 now and then.

[/ QUOTE ]I think you're being results oriented here.

[ahnuld]

u guys dont remeber this gimmick made a post in NVG or BBV attacking online gambling as immoral? Please no more attention to this thread.

[carol-ann]

You misrepresent that BBV thread; you may need to reread it.

It wasn't about the morality of online gambling, it was about there not being longterm winners in online poker due to the horrible, horrible rake.

And I basically just posted a link to the article by some other donk.

[futuredoc85]

the rake online is less than the rake live [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[carol-ann]

The donk who wrote the article I linked to sidestepped that issue.