#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players. FWIW, hands like T9s, 22 and the like are a reasonable part of his range - it's not like a 19/17 is generally only 3betting with QQ+ and AK here. Plus, due to the structure of the board it's very less likely that he will fire a 2nd barrel without a hand than can beat a pair of Queens, so we don't have to worry too much about reverse implied odds. [/ QUOTE ] Fair enuff but at the same time a lot of his hands will be ahead of you or can draw out on you in which case a call is not ideal. Sure small pairs are part of his range but how often is this a small pair? Not very often IMO. Again Im not saying that a fold is the way to go but I certainily need more convincing thats its a bad option. Also with a marginal hand like this, if we are going to play shouldnt we be raising??? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players. [/ QUOTE ] Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
I don't think a 19/17 is 3betting 22/T9s when he's out of position. Actually I think it's probably not a good idea to be doing that (if I were villain), but I suck at playing 3-bet pots.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players. [/ QUOTE ] Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not. [/ QUOTE ] I think sixhigh is referring to suggestion of folding to flop bet |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
The problem with raising is, that he can play perfectly against us. I.e. we don't fold out any better hands and he doesn't call with worse hands. He will have a draw with more than 4 outs very rarely, so we don't have to protect our hand.
But the best option is to dump it preflop if we are unsure how to handle spots like this. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players. [/ QUOTE ] Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not. [/ QUOTE ] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players. [/ QUOTE ] Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not. [/ QUOTE ] +1 I probably fold pre here less often than I should. I think I play the hand exactly the same as OP 4/5 times. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] I thought he meant folding the flop??? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
River seems like a block bet could be JJ-TT (if he's bad), AK or AA (depending on his agression factor). Looks okay without a good read.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play
I 4bet pre against a standard tag.
|
|
|