Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-04-2007, 11:15 AM
Shes92 Shes92 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Perth, Aus
Posts: 326
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players. FWIW, hands like T9s, 22 and the like are a reasonable part of his range - it's not like a 19/17 is generally only 3betting with QQ+ and AK here.

Plus, due to the structure of the board it's very less likely that he will fire a 2nd barrel without a hand than can beat a pair of Queens, so we don't have to worry too much about reverse implied odds.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enuff but at the same time a lot of his hands will be ahead of you or can draw out on you in which case a call is not ideal. Sure small pairs are part of his range but how often is this a small pair? Not very often IMO. Again Im not saying that a fold is the way to go but I certainily need more convincing thats its a bad option.

Also with a marginal hand like this, if we are going to play shouldnt we be raising???
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-04-2007, 11:19 AM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-04-2007, 11:20 AM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

I don't think a 19/17 is 3betting 22/T9s when he's out of position. Actually I think it's probably not a good idea to be doing that (if I were villain), but I suck at playing 3-bet pots.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-04-2007, 11:22 AM
Shes92 Shes92 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Perth, Aus
Posts: 326
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think sixhigh is referring to suggestion of folding to flop bet
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-04-2007, 11:23 AM
sixhigh sixhigh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Highway 61
Posts: 1,778
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

The problem with raising is, that he can play perfectly against us. I.e. we don't fold out any better hands and he doesn't call with worse hands. He will have a draw with more than 4 outs very rarely, so we don't have to protect our hand.

But the best option is to dump it preflop if we are unsure how to handle spots like this.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-04-2007, 11:37 AM
loosbastard loosbastard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: gettin\' no respect
Posts: 1,284
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-04-2007, 12:25 PM
holland3r holland3r is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Running Wayyyy Below Expectation
Posts: 492
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. I fold here vs a standard TAG until I think they are 3betting light. This is nowhere near a profitable pf call unless the guy is light 3betting, which an awful lot of random 19/17s are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

+1 I probably fold pre here less often than I should. I think I play the hand exactly the same as OP 4/5 times.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-04-2007, 12:30 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Folding in this situation is one of the reasons why so many 'tags' get run over by better players.

[/ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]

I thought he meant folding the flop???
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-04-2007, 12:31 PM
HoldEmNewby HoldEmNewby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: \"Noony noony noo...\"
Posts: 2,019
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

River seems like a block bet could be JJ-TT (if he's bad), AK or AA (depending on his agression factor). Looks okay without a good read.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-04-2007, 01:06 PM
deaders deaders is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Perth, AU
Posts: 3,362
Default Re: [NL200]AQ against a squeeze play

I 4bet pre against a standard tag.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.