#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QTs paired board
My comment about pot size was based on an assumption that there were lots of callers to a raise. If it's likely to be 12:1 or so back to us you'll likely have to call... but that's a miscalc on my part. So I like the turn bet here.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QTs paired board
[ QUOTE ]
who are you, wtf are you talking about, and how did you manage to include broken image tags even after editing? [/ QUOTE ] He's George Bush, laughing at the internets, LDO. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QTs paired board
[ QUOTE ]
[image][/image] [/ QUOTE ] WTUFO? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QTs paired board
I'm probably b/f'ing the turn. A raise would probably signal that villain's either hit the ace or else had trips on the flop.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QTs paired board
[ QUOTE ]
Also, in light of fantam's post, I put in a nomination that Aussie's title be changed to "microHachem" or perhaps "uHachem." [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] uHachem only thing is 1. Greens cant mess with greens, only reds can mess with greens accounts 2. the vbulletin upgrade that is being talked about in ATF may well reset all titles back to default anyways and/or may have changes to the way custom titles are done....Im actually not up to speed in the details of said upgrade so if your interested in more info on this go checkout the thread(s) in About the Forums. gogogo |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QTs paired board
* Grunch *\
pf is fine, no need to justify it as being loose flop - good would check if 1st to act. cr if it is checked to the last player who then bets turn - bet, fold if raised |
|
|