#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: middle set vs. huge fish
Ah, misread that there were 4 to the flop.
AF is simply (raise % + bet %)/ call %. For someone who has a VPIP of 93 that's a high aggression factor. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: middle set vs. huge fish
Yeah but his PFR is 31%. 31% PFR and 1.5 PFA generally means a player that has a huge disconnect between preflop and postflop play. An average player with similar VP$IP/PFR in my database would generally have a postflop aggression of 3-5 since they often bet any piece or any draw on the flop.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: middle set vs. huge fish
Ok to stop this it doesn't converge quickly enough I'd say, 75 hands being far too less.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: middle set vs. huge fish
I got the impression that those stats were for the UTG limper, not for the button PFR. Anyway, leading the flop is standard as is bet/calling the turn.
I usually pot the flop here, but if you regularly bet 2/3 pot or so on dry boards, that could actually be a good strategy since there will be a lot of chances for cheap steals, and when you have a real hand on that kind of board, you're not too worried about someone drawing against you. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: middle set vs. huge fish
Getting it all in here is obv fine.
|
|
|