|
|
#11
09-02-2007, 10:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars VS. FTP Players
Not to mention the horrible FTP support and their stupid points, not to mention the horribly lagging software. I don't see how anyone can play on FTP, Stars is clearly the best.
|
|
#13
09-02-2007, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars VS. FTP Players
[ QUOTE ]
Not to mention the horrible FTP support and their stupid points, not to mention the horribly lagging software. I don't see how anyone can play on FTP, Stars is clearly the best. [/ QUOTE ] FTP = rakeback [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
09-02-2007, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars VS. FTP Players
i hate pstars. only thing they have going for them is the tournaments.
|
|
#15
09-03-2007, 07:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars VS. FTP Players
Just moved to FTP last week after being a regular on stars for the last year.
I play stud and there are way more fish at FTP, partly due to the ante structure, but in general both are huge sites with large amounts of terrible players. For me, FTP = rakeback plus bonus Which makes it superior
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
