#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
I agree
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
This is a perfect flop to cbet. Other than that, I think the hand looks good.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
Yep I agree with the above
I prefer a continuation bet on the flop pretty much all the time. Everything else looks perfect |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
Usually i cbet this flop all the time. I cbet ~90% when HU.
Maybe I was mixing it up at the wrong time :/ Everything had been much, much easier on the turn. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
Bet the flop FTW.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Just wondering, why does everyone think that hero shouldn't bet flop? [/ QUOTE ] I bet that flop 100% of the time if I've raised pf and villian isn't a complete station. K46r is better but Q64r is still a nice flop. [/ QUOTE ] i bet this flop 100% of the time when villain IS a station. we have a 6! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
Villain is 78/26, I don't mind a cbet, but I certainly don't mind a check either.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
I donīt understand why you should cbet this flop, when villain most likely going to call anyway, and bottom pair canīt take this down often enough to make it profitable, right?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
It would be because if he has nothing we have the best hand and if he has something we would build a pot to make bigger bets when we hit the straight. Also he is not calling anyway, he's calling way more often than he should.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL25: turned 2p, reraise = spew?
i guess i'm the only one who calls the river against this villian? :{
|
|
|