Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-26-2007, 02:56 PM
DaycareInferno DaycareInferno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: wot u say
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: NL10 FT vs Stars

yep. with the same vp, you'll pay more like 5BB/100 at nl25 and 4 at 50.

beating 10 is harder to beat than a lot of people give it credit for being. table selection is important, even though there are so many bad players, because you basically have to crush the game to win.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-26-2007, 03:39 PM
ICMoney ICMoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Watching Vids > Playing
Posts: 1,720
Default Re: NL10 FT vs Stars

I wouldn't play at FT without rake.

Set it up once and profit forever as you move up.

Don't really think you need extensive table selection at NL10.

If you don't want RB I would stay at Stars.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.