|
|
#11
08-19-2007, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 200 Two pair
Cbet more on the flop please. Especially 3 ways. I probably call because of the turn check, but I also lose a decent amount of pots this way.
|
|
#12
08-19-2007, 08:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 200 Two pair
[ QUOTE ]
River is an easy fold. Cant imagine a passive player betting pot with less than QJ here. [/ QUOTE ] you beat QJ though... BT, why is this an easy fold? You put villain on flopped straight and no agg on any street but river? also, wtf is up with your PFR and your flop bets? this isn't tournament, 2.5 bb isn't going to cut it PF, and 1/2 pot isn't any good 4 ways. you have a strong hand, and against poor villains i would be more than willing to stack off here against various draws, AK, etc.
|
|
#13
08-20-2007, 12:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 200 Two pair
Oh dear god, I thought it was NL100 with preflop action. Please do something different there.
|
|
#14
08-20-2007, 12:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 200 Two pair
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] River is an easy fold. Cant imagine a passive player betting pot with less than QJ here. [/ QUOTE ] you beat QJ though... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but is that enough for us to be ahead a third of the time? I don't think so.
|
|
#15
08-20-2007, 11:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 200 Two pair
no, i'm just saying, with the kind of action there, it's really hard to say what a good play is.
i mean, against a good player, you're not winning often. top 2, sets, straights, are all better than your top and bottom, especially on such a dangerous high card board.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
