|
|
|
|
#1
08-18-2007, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Was this ruling correct?
When this happens at our home game we just play the hand out like normal, its the players fault for exposing his hand, theres no reason to penalize the other player.
|
|
#2
08-18-2007, 05:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was this ruling correct?
[ QUOTE ]
When this happens at our home game we just play the hand out like normal, its the players fault for exposing his hand, theres no reason to penalize the other player. [/ QUOTE ] Sounds like pretty much everybody agrees.
|
|
#3
08-19-2007, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was this ruling correct?
=)
|
|
#4
08-20-2007, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was this ruling correct?
i think the ruling is that MP1 cannot act anymore and all action is on SB so he can check it down to the river or he can raise... this happened at my casino so im pretty sure this is the ruling..
|
|
#5
08-20-2007, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was this ruling correct?
[ QUOTE ]
i think the ruling is that MP1 cannot act anymore and all action is on SB so he can check it down to the river or he can raise... this happened at my casino so im pretty sure this is the ruling.. [/ QUOTE ] Your casino is wrong. Well they can make whatever rule they want, but the need people with more experience.
|
|
#6
08-21-2007, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was this ruling correct?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i think the ruling is that MP1 cannot act anymore and all action is on SB so he can check it down to the river or he can raise... this happened at my casino so im pretty sure this is the ruling.. [/ QUOTE ] Your casino is wrong. Well they can make whatever rule they want, but the need people with more experience. [/ QUOTE ] If they rule this way, it's a bad rule
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
