|
|
#11
08-12-2007, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Pretty clear fold as played imo [/ QUOTE ] Darn, I hate it when Shillx disagrees with me. I got some homework to do. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Shillx - is this because of the buy-in? Would you say call if it was (a lot) lower? [/ QUOTE ] No, it just seems doubtful that you have 37% equity. The reality is that it doesn't matter what you do since you will never be in this situation. 
|
|
#12
08-12-2007, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Pretty clear fold as played imo [/ QUOTE ] Darn, I hate it when Shillx disagrees with me. I got some homework to do. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Shillx - is this because of the buy-in? Would you say call if it was (a lot) lower? [/ QUOTE ] No, it just seems doubtful that you have 37% equity. [/ QUOTE ] In a lower buy-in you might, I think. I'll play with some ranges (but no need to bore this thread as it would be entirely irrelevant). [ QUOTE ] The reality is that it doesn't matter what you do since you will never be in this situation. [/ QUOTE ] Very very true.
|
|
#13
08-12-2007, 08:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Pretty clear fold as played imo [/ QUOTE ] Darn, I hate it when Shillx disagrees with me. I got some homework to do. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Shillx - is this because of the buy-in? Would you say call if it was (a lot) lower? [/ QUOTE ] No, it just seems doubtful that you have 37% equity. The reality is that it doesn't matter what you do since you will never be in this situation. [/ QUOTE ] Shillx, you don't think we have 37% equity?? What ranges are you giving them?
|
|
#15
08-12-2007, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
[ QUOTE ]
i think the most likely situation here is you being up against AQ+ and JJ+. I guess 1st guy could have....66+AJ+ but second guy has to be TT+AK? or am i wrong here. [/ QUOTE ] I think that's way too tight.
|
|
#16
08-12-2007, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
For some reason I thought this was a live sng. Live vs online maybe changes my thoughts. If it's online then the players are better but we have no reads, don't know our table image. I can't imagine this being an absolutely bad call. Of course we're open shoving with TT. Maybe this is a horrible call, imo it's close, if it's close I call.
|
|
#17
08-12-2007, 08:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i think the most likely situation here is you being up against AQ+ and JJ+. I guess 1st guy could have....66+AJ+ but second guy has to be TT+AK? or am i wrong here. [/ QUOTE ] I think that's way too tight. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's fine, why do u disagree? what ranges do u give 1 pusha and the overcalla EDIT: Just realised overcalla is in BB which greatly increases his range IMO and I agree with chip more now. Still would be interested to see what range you give tho.
|
|
#18
08-12-2007, 09:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i think the most likely situation here is you being up against AQ+ and JJ+. I guess 1st guy could have....66+AJ+ but second guy has to be TT+AK? or am i wrong here. [/ QUOTE ] I think that's way too tight. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's fine, why do u disagree? what ranges do u give 1 pusha and the overcalla EDIT: Just realised overcalla is in BB which greatly increases his range IMO and I agree with chip more now. Still would be interested to see what range you give tho. [/ QUOTE ] This really depends on the player. If players are solid, then I'd assume pretty tight ranges. But against donks or even unknowns I could see them being semi-wide. So assuming players are unknown, I would say the CO range seems pretty good on average. But I would put BB on something like 66+, ATs+, AJo+, KQs. Folding TT here just seems criminal. Also, is there not a small blind in this hand?? Because that really changes my viewpoint on the hand, and I didn't notice that before.
|
|
#19
08-13-2007, 03:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 108 $ sng, TT ?
[ QUOTE ]
Also, is there not a small blind in this hand?? [/ QUOTE ] yes. my range for cutoff :99+,AQs+,AQo+ my range for bb :22+,AJs+,KQs,AQo+ i think i have 32.705% equity here . It's enough or not ? how calculate it ?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
