wide 3 betting ranges oop

[jackflashdrive]

OP is seriously confused. Just take it away PF if opponent is 3-betting light.

If you are right and he doesn't have a pair on the flop, he will still catch 1/4 times (assuming he doesn't fold).

If you are wrong and he does have a pair then you are 1 in 10.

If I thought I had a lot of fold equity I'd be much happier bluffing with just one overcard to the flop (which hits 50 percent more often than 22). Ideally you'd have two overcards or some kind of draw.

People taking the silly line of letting an opponent see a flop and then felting 22 (a 9 high flop, he must have missed!) is a lag's bread and butter.

[Roy]

Lol. I would rather have 23s.

[JooWish622]

[ QUOTE ]
OP is seriously confused. Just take it away PF if opponent is 3-betting light.

If you are right and he doesn't have a pair on the flop, he will still catch 1/4 times (assuming he doesn't fold).

If you are wrong and he does have a pair then you are 1 in 10.

If I thought I had a lot of fold equity I'd be much happier bluffing with just one overcard to the flop (which hits 50 percent more often than 22). Ideally you'd have two overcards or some kind of draw.

People taking the silly line of letting an opponent see a flop and then felting 22 (a 9 high flop, he must have missed!) is a lag's bread and butter.

[/ QUOTE ]

you are also pretty confused sir

[Trix]

I think for calling a reraise in position with 22, the post flop action has to sometimes just get checked all the way with you having the best hand, you also have to know which boards you can shove over(or float) a cb on and be good at figuring out when to bet if he check the flop.
Most of the value of a hand like this probably comes from hitting a set, just not enough that you can call only for set value.
As mentioned earlier, it´s a decent hand to 4bet bluff.