|
|
#11
08-02-2007, 12:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: set vs. TAG 25/50
[ QUOTE ]
If villain has two diamonds wouldn't he repop you on the flop? This seems more like an overpair with a diamond which means he has 10 outs to beat you. Checking behind lets him get there for free, which seems criminal. I'd bet ~$2k. [/ QUOTE ] Seems to me it's very reasonable to call with some flushes on this flop. (Specifically ones that don't have an A or a straight draw.) It looks a lot like OP has a big overpair, a flush draw, or a set, so I think instapushing with these stacks may be a mistake. 
|
|
#12
08-02-2007, 01:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
|
#15
08-02-2007, 08:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: set vs. TAG 25/50
[ QUOTE ]
I'd be in the check-behind camp but this board is getting ugly so fast... I'm assuming you're not worried about being beat and primarily trying to figure out how to maximize value here, but there's just way too many bad cards that can beat you/make it totally impossible to get another bet on the river so I'd bet the turn for like two-thirds pot and hope he plays along. Kirk [/ QUOTE ] yep
|
|
#16
08-02-2007, 10:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: set vs. TAG 25/50
i agree with what blueman says that it looks like AA-QQ. and checking will easily make him think he has the best hand also if hes trapping with the nuts your not putting more money in
|
|
#17
08-02-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: set vs. TAG 25/50
bet for hand protection 1,8k
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
