|
|
#13
07-27-2007, 10:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Muck
if hes really nitty u can just call pf.
|
|
#16
07-27-2007, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Muck
Sucks, but I think you made the right play. As you described them I think AT can be eliminated from their range.
|
|
#17
07-27-2007, 11:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Muck
Hey FGators. Off the subject. I hope your reading all these "My awesome hand vs that nit, FGators" threads and using all these preconcieved notions on how u play to take all these 2+2er's $$$$$. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#18
07-28-2007, 12:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Muck
If he's really nitty (enough to make you b/f or c/f an all under flop) then just calling PF is ok I think. Also, I would rather c/c 1 street and c/f the turn than bet/fold. I dunno, Redd makes a good point though.
|
|
#19
07-28-2007, 12:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Muck
[ QUOTE ]
Does anybody check/fold this flop? I know its ridiculous weak/tight but the more I think about it this person is really nitty and bad and I don't see him/her stabbing at this flop with anything but a hand I beat. [/ QUOTE ] You should reconsider PF if this is the case.
|
|
#20
07-28-2007, 01:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Muck
[ QUOTE ]
gators, what if instead of looking for spots to fold vs nits you tried to change your game up so you were ecstatic to get it in any time you have a good overpair. [/ QUOTE ] What exactly does this mean? I don't think I have a "good overpair" and I think the consensus is that getting it in here is suicide and is in need of some serious runner runner.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
