I'm sorry Ms. Jackson. I'M JUST FOR REALLZZZ

[HumbertHumbert]

your flop bet is too weak. you should bet like 50 on the flop.

[Roger Mainfield]

His bet is okay, I would bet like 43$ personally. Vs a 17/10/2 in a re-raised pot this is not a very scary board, there isn't much need to protect so you don't need to c-bet as much as usual.

[carrotsnake]

betting 50 on this flop would be attrocious :/

[Nick Royale]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
17/10? Would he really do this with QQ/JJ? AhKh isn't possible. I don't know, I feel like this is a set or AA a lot of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Give him the very tight range of basically 22, 99+:


equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 52.581% 50.88% 01.70% 14103 472.50 { 99+, 22 }
Hand 1: 47.419% 45.71% 01.70% 12672 472.50 { KdKh }

I think this has to be A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] sometimes.

Do you seriously want to fold this? Cause that's gross.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not stacking off 175bb with KK on this flop vs a nittish tag is gross? The QQ/JJ should be much more discounted than KK+/TT/99/22 because a 17/10 doesn't stack off 175bb with them in this situation like ever ime.

Against this range we have 38% equity and we need 41%: QQ+,TT-99,22,AhQh,AhJh

And leaving JJ out equals QQ/JJ being 50% less likely than KK+/TT/99/22 and that's definately a fair assumption. I think villain is raising a set on a drawy flop like this that's superb for stacking a high PP very often. And this deep I think he'll often peel the flop with a draw, but there's really not that many draw combos anyway.

[Poker_is_Hard]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
17/10? Would he really do this with QQ/JJ? AhKh isn't possible. I don't know, I feel like this is a set or AA a lot of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Give him the very tight range of basically 22, 99+:


equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 52.581% 50.88% 01.70% 14103 472.50 { 99+, 22 }
Hand 1: 47.419% 45.71% 01.70% 12672 472.50 { KdKh }

I think this has to be A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] sometimes.

Do you seriously want to fold this? Cause that's gross.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not stacking off 175bb with KK on this flop vs a nittish tag is gross? The QQ/JJ should be much more discounted than KK+/TT/99/22 because a 17/10 doesn't stack off 175bb with them in this situation like ever ime.

Against this range we have 38% equity and we need 41%: QQ+,TT-99,22,AhQh,AhJh

And leaving JJ out equals QQ/JJ being 50% less likely than KK+/TT/99/22 and that's definately a fair assumption. I think villain is raising a set on a drawy flop like this that's superb for stacking a high PP very often. And this deep I think he'll often peel the flop with a draw, but there's really not that many draw combos anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]
huh?

You start by saying NOT stacking off is gross, and then end by saying most draws flat call and sets raise?

I'm confused as usual.

[Nick Royale]

[ QUOTE ]
huh?

You start by saying NOT stacking off is gross, and then end by saying most draws flat call and sets raise?

I'm confused as usual.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think you missed the questionmark in the end of the first sentence. I think this is a pretty marginal situation, I'm leaning towards folding.

[Poker_is_Hard]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
huh?

You start by saying NOT stacking off is gross, and then end by saying most draws flat call and sets raise?

I'm confused as usual.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think you missed the questionmark in the end of the first sentence. I think this is a pretty marginal situation, I'm leaning towards folding.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yep [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[892King]

shove

[Check_The_Nuts]

I never play KK like this in this spot. Interested to see if you were good or not.

[fees]

I think this is really close, but I think I might lean towards a fold.. what were results im really curious