NL25 - Contibet or not?

[hennnerz]

[ QUOTE ]
I C/F these flops unless you have reads on the players. Unless you have any kind or read or play time with the vilans then C/F is standard.

Personally i continuation bet with pairs and A X

[/ QUOTE ]

Like Hand 2?

Some flops it is TOTALLY pointless ie. 22 board KQJ. I hate betting that flop, so don't. Here I will sometimes bet hand 1, depending on villain and previous hands against him.

Hand 2 I would always bet this flop.

[CobraGoat]

fold PF, yuck. as played cbet both.

[Go_BroKe]

cbet both of them
cbet 90% of the flops headsup

[Capone]

I c-bet both here as well.

I would really check out ur pf play though.

[ama0330]

I cbet both but hand 1 raise is no good.

[OMGJuliet]

60% of my cbets get raised or checkraised. you usually dont see the villains hand unless you have some kind of nutz. today i had the following case:

villain limps, i raise AK he calls.
flop 259
he checks, i 2/3PS, he c/r minimum i call.
turn blank, he pushes for his last 7$, i make a tilt-call bcuz im pissed that my contbet got raised like 10 times in a row, i call w/ overcards AK.
he shows AQo. i win w/ highcard ace.

thats why:
- cbetting more than 90% is a huge leak on nl25 sh. you donate more money to the checkraisers than you get from folding. you give up tons of equity w bet/folding.
- if they got some kind of OCs or PP they'll stay in the pot 75% of the time.

it's a while ago but it'll still be accurrate: i noted every contbetsituation over like 15k hands and wrote down how often my contbets get checkraised or raised. it is indeed 60% which is a lot. there is no way they flop twopair or a set 60% of the time.
then i started 3betting raised flops, where i was the PFR. it didn't help at all, only the variance went way up with the 3bets as the pots got bigger.

[monkover]

i´m pretty much cbetting both flops. the board is not too wet