Limped 6-max hand - Page 2

Nairb · #11 07-20-2007, 09:52 AM

Hmm the question is did villian check behind you to make a value bet on the river with the flush? I probably check again and call a bet if odds justify with any read at all thet he may be weak, his play on the turn. My gut says you are behind to a somewhat weak A here but you may be ahead with second pair. Betting here may not be awful but you are behind such a wide range he may have played here you may have to fold to a raise.

On balance I check and see if villian bets. If you are ahead with 2nd pair there is also a great chance he will check behind. It would be hard for him to bet a weak A here I think.

mflip · #12 07-20-2007, 09:58 AM

I doubt you can make anything except for total air fold so I guess check/call. I don't think check/fold is terribly wrong but it's pretty weak.

BarryLyndon · #13 07-20-2007, 10:05 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I doubt you can make anything except for total air fold so I guess check/call. I don't think check/fold is terribly wrong but it's pretty weak.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think check/fold is wrong depending on what he bets.

Barry

mflip · #14 07-20-2007, 10:13 AM

How many naked hearts are in his range that aren't AxXh?

ThePershore · #15 07-20-2007, 10:31 AM

Check flop, c/c river now dependent on how much he bets obv.

BarryLyndon · #16 07-20-2007, 10:40 AM

[ QUOTE ]
How many naked hearts are in his range that aren't AxXh?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not a whole lot, but given the action, that he has Qh or Jh enough so that if he bets half the pot, I'd call pretty quickly. I don't think he has QQ here; in fact, most of the time, I think he has a weak ace or king, but I'd pay a half PSB, not more.

Barry

mflip · #17 07-20-2007, 10:48 AM

Alright, as long as he can bluff a missed flush draw here c/c a medium/small bet

registrar · #18 07-20-2007, 10:50 AM

This was a naff hand to post - my apologies.

I think his range is way wider than hands that make sense. That was how I felt as the hand went down and, of course, I know the results but I think it's worth bearing in mind that almost all pair+ [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] hands call bets and I think we can get two bets in agaisnt worse hands here and safely fold if we get bet into or raised at any stage. This does not make betting necessarily correct.

JARID · #19 07-20-2007, 11:06 AM

Registrar,

Check/something...probably call a smallish bet. The thing about this flop being [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] is that utg could easilly be peeling with the T-Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] taking the free card on tossing out on the river bet.

BlueEcho · #20 07-20-2007, 11:12 AM

[ QUOTE ]
This was a naff hand to post - my apologies.

I think his range is way wider than hands that make sense. That was how I felt as the hand went down and, of course, I know the results but I think it's worth bearing in mind that almost all pair+ [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] hands call bets and I think we can get two bets in agaisnt worse hands here and safely fold if we get bet into or raised at any stage. This does not make betting necessarily correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is true only if we don't give villian credit for being able to steal the river with air. I somehow am happier letting villian bet here and picking off a hand I beat meanwhile getting a showdown cheaper. Not saying I'm correct HAHA.