Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-18-2007, 12:03 PM
Fonkey123 Fonkey123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: University Park
Posts: 4,428
Default Re: Why is it wrong to assume all draw cards are not live?

[ QUOTE ]
another way to put it is that if you play 9-handed and are drawing to a flush, the standard is to assume there are 9 flush cards left out of 47 remaining. if you did it your way you could guess ~6 flush cards left of of 31 remaining or whatever. they should work out the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but it's obv so much easier to just assume 9 outs/ 47 cards remaining than convert the ration down to Xouts/ 12 cards, given they'll be the same ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-18-2007, 12:05 PM
schwza schwza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: get more chips than chips ahoy
Posts: 10,485
Default Re: Why is it wrong to assume all draw cards are not live?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
another way to put it is that if you play 9-handed and are drawing to a flush, the standard is to assume there are 9 flush cards left out of 47 remaining. if you did it your way you could guess ~6 flush cards left of of 31 remaining or whatever. they should work out the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but it's obv so much easier to just assume 9 outs/ 47 cards remaining than convert the ration down to Xouts/ 12 cards, given they'll be the same ratio.

[/ QUOTE ]

oh definitely. i wasn't suggesting you actually try to do the ~6/31 thing at a table.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-18-2007, 12:16 PM
NOSUP4U NOSUP4U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 275
Default Re: Why is it wrong to assume all draw cards are not live?

[ QUOTE ]
When you have a flush draw, you usually count it as you have 9 outs. I know that this is correct, and this post by no means is trying to claim otherwise!

But I'm curious as to why we can not assume that some flush cards have already been dealt out. As an extreme, what if we were playing a 20 handed table for whatever reason. Do we still count it as 9 outs, even though there's only 12 cards left in the deck after all hole cards have been dealt?


[/ QUOTE ]

The issue here is the wording on your question. We aren't concerned with how many cards are left in the deck. The odds of a flush hitting are derived from how many cards are unknown to us, including opponents hole cards. The odds just assume the flush cards are equally distributed over all unknown cards.

Obviously if opponents are holding 6 of your outs, your 'real' likelyhood of hitting your flush is much less. And conversely, if they hold none its much higher. The odds are just an average based on what is known to you.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-20-2007, 12:10 PM
Psy_Mike Psy_Mike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 384
Default Re: Why is it wrong to assume all draw cards are not live?

[ QUOTE ]
another way to put it is that if you play 9-handed and are drawing to a flush, the standard is to assume there are 9 flush cards left out of 47 remaining. if you did it your way you could guess ~6 flush cards left of of 31 remaining or whatever. they should work out the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry for bringing this to life again hehe. But why does the 6/31 and 9/47 not match up? By using that method, in a 6 handed game your chance of hitting the flush becomes 1-3.65 and in a 9 handed game 1-4.17.

Where is the error in this?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.