|
|
#11
07-16-2007, 10:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
[ QUOTE ]
**From a post replying to SpaceGravy's brag on 35-tabling** Last Feburary I was 38-tabling the 16s for 2 weeks straight, profitably. You really can't be serious when you know I was the first one to do this. Although i'm done with the mega multi-tabling, I still like to remain assured that I was the only one to do it profitably for as long as I did. Until you put in three months of playing at least 27 or more at once, then you are not correct in saying you are the first and only one who can do it. Aside from my argument, how is the variance treating you? I had some pretty sick downswings that lasted even weeks long. My advice is that you only do this for a mere entertainment's sake, because the volatility of the buyins you can win/drop can severely affect your temperment (which we all know controls our tilt). Good luck! Oh and one more thing, the most I have had going on at once is 43 tables. Now, you may be able to surpass that but why even bother? I believe it is just egotistical past 38 since I know I would not be profitable past 38 at once. If I really wanted to just for ego's sake, then I would have had over 50 at once last winter. RaiNKhAN [/ QUOTE ] Sholdn't you be sleeping right now ? |
|
#13
07-16-2007, 11:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure he didn't have a + ROI, and especially not when doing that. Ryan [/ QUOTE ] He was always on that many tables and his sharkscope graph has been posted many times. He was winning. [/ QUOTE ] lol. he got crushed. just go to sharkscope and check it out for yourself. he was doing ok when the games were soft, but once neteller shut down and the games tightened up, he tumbled. -BK |
|
#14
07-16-2007, 11:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positive ROI playing 26 tables at a time
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure he didn't have a + ROI, and especially not when doing that. Ryan [/ QUOTE ] He was always on that many tables and his sharkscope graph has been posted many times. He was winning. [/ QUOTE ] lol. he got crushed. just go to sharkscope and check it out for yourself. he was doing ok when the games were soft, but once neteller shut down and the games tightened up, he tumbled. -BK [/ QUOTE ] Wrong. Edit - I can't find the post now but a year or two ago I posted his graph in the Books & Publications forum where someone in a kill phil thread said that you probably couldn't multi-table SnGs and be a winning player. This was when he still massively multi-tabled the 16's and or 27's. One day he was 27 tabling the $16's and then all of a sudden he was in the $500 and $1000 SnGs. Those high stakes ones are where he got crushed. |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
