#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AQs
Betting or checking the turn is a toss-up, but I'd probably have to go with the check readless. The hand looks a lot stronger than it really is. Betting is by no means a real mistake, though.
As played, 11 outs to nuts + 3.5:1 = call the push |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AQs
[ QUOTE ]
I hate checking the turn as we are put in a really bad spot if he bluff/value shoves. [/ QUOTE ] The thing about this is - what would he be bluffing with? A small pair is not floating that flop vs a big UTG raise and bet. Also, the value shove is a move I hardly ever saw at 100nl, a 1/2-2/3 psb is much more likely. A check basically tells you what kind of hand he has. Most hands that beat you don't check behind, and most draws don't bet. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AQs
I totally misread our hand. We have the FD ourselves. Excellent. Then play it as it was played; you cannot fold to the turn shove.
C/r the turn AI is also a good variation. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AQs
[ QUOTE ]
C/r the turn AI is sexy [/ QUOTE ] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AQs
I like checking the turn also. We have a ton of outs if we are behind so a free card doesn't hurt us.
|
|
|