standard (?) bluff in 3bet pot

[Ship Ship McGipp]

my problem is that it's only that. your squeeze range should be wide, and that's all you can represent at this point in time. maybe i'm overthinking it and it depends what level villian is on, but that's what camp i'm in.

[DJ Sensei]

seems pretty reasonable

[student_of_game]

I'm unclear what hand you are representing that checks behind the flop. What's your 3-betting range (from Villain's perspective)?

[jfish]

like i said, no relevant history w/ villain. i havent been 3betting him light. also, he SHOULD give me more credit, since this is the first time ive [censored] with his utg open.

[student_of_game]

Hi Jfish,

I would think that you are more likely to get away with this bluff if you have been three betting light than if you haven't. What hands are you representing that beat him? AA, AK, TT?

Given effective stack sizes and the odds villain is getting, I don't know that this succeeds often enough to be +EV, especially since villain called the turn. Unless you're trying to level him by bluffing in a spot where it doesn't seem like you have enough fold equity.

[cts]

yes , wp on all streets

obv he is calling with AK tho Artiurus are u on crack?

[AAismyfriend]

[ QUOTE ]
seems pretty reasonable

[/ QUOTE ]

[psuasskicker]

AK definitely calls this river. Anything worse probably doesn't. I like it.

- C -

[poker12]

i dont understand on this board why you dont bet 110ish flop & then put him in on the turn?

[Parlay Slow]

[ QUOTE ]
I actually really like this. He can't call with AK.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol what