TheBryce (Freedom25) 1k/2k HU Bankroll Qestion?

[baronzeus]

the reason its useless is because pt treats each site differently. on some sites PT will add in the stat for EVERY hand. on some sites PT will only add hands where you don't muck.

for example, he might be winning 84% with one pair because he is the one betting in those cases. the times you bet and he calls with 1 pair aren't counted.

And if you throw out all the hands where he doesnt have initiative at the end, it's pretty obvious his premium freq will be higher than yours.


just as a ref, look at stars vs absolute stats for your play. im sure the ap numbers will look a lot prettier than your stars #s

[kahntrutahn]

[ QUOTE ]
the reason its useless is because pt treats each site differently. on some sites PT will add in the stat for EVERY hand. on some sites PT will only add hands where you don't muck.

for example, he might be winning 84% with one pair because he is the one betting in those cases. the times you bet and he calls with 1 pair aren't counted.

And if you throw out all the hands where he doesnt have initiative at the end, it's pretty obvious his premium freq will be higher than yours.


just as a ref, look at stars vs absolute stats for your play. im sure the ap numbers will look a lot prettier than your stars #s

[/ QUOTE ]


I'm aware of this argument, and I don't think it applies to this circumstance.

[baronzeus]

theres not a chance in the world hes winning 85%+ of his 1 pair+ hands at showdown. if he did your W$SD would be 12. which is not possible given his W$SD.

[kahntrutahn]

[ QUOTE ]
theres not a chance in the world hes winning 85%+ of his 1 pair+ hands at showdown. if he did your W$SD would be 12. which is not possible given his W$SD.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im 40.5 / 39 against this guy so far. Shoot me in the face.

[baronzeus]

what is your W$WSF?

a W$SD of 39 can't really correlate to those numbers then, right

[kahntrutahn]

[ QUOTE ]
what is your W$WSF?

a W$SD of 39 can't really correlate to those numbers then, right

[/ QUOTE ]

49%, yet Im down 200+ bets...

[baronzeus]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what is your W$WSF?

a W$SD of 39 can't really correlate to those numbers then, right

[/ QUOTE ]

49%, yet Im down 200+ bets...

[/ QUOTE ]


id like to talk to you later about this when i have more time. this says some interesting things about you/your oppt

[kahntrutahn]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what is your W$WSF?

a W$SD of 39 can't really correlate to those numbers then, right

[/ QUOTE ]

49%, yet Im down 200+ bets...

[/ QUOTE ]


id like to talk to you later about this when i have more time. this says some interesting things about you/your oppt

[/ QUOTE ]


I can call is hand out way more than anyone else's hand EVER. Yet, I'm always second best, and I have to showdown.... It's the most godawful thing I've ever encountered insofar as LHE variance goes. I'd almost rather another 1000 BB downswing than losing 200+ bets to someone I can read like a [censored] book.

[kahntrutahn]

[ QUOTE ]
Right now TheBryce is playing 1k/2k now on FTP. What kind of bankroll do you need to play this high online and HU for that matter.

-Crazy Mike

[/ QUOTE ]


FYI, I think the match ended with a draw. I didn't get quite all of it though...

[PartyGirlUK]

kant who is the fish you talk about? pm me if nec.