Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-30-2007, 06:47 PM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

[ QUOTE ]
i don't understand why simeon rice gets so little love. his career compares pretty well with strahans.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rice is a speed pass rushing specialist. Strahan is a much more complete player.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-30-2007, 06:53 PM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

Bruce has to get in. He is miles ahead of other WR in the HOF.

Isaac Bruce: 887-13376-80
Art Monk: 940-12721-68 <-- widely considered best WR not in HOF
Michael Irvin: 750-11904-65
John Stallworth: 537-8723-63
Lynn Swann: 336-5462-51

Oh, and he's still playing.

LDT will be a lock with one or two more good years, which the author says in the article. He says it's a "formality" and he will be a lock soon.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-30-2007, 07:04 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,773
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

thoughts on corey dillon?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-30-2007, 07:52 PM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Isaac Bruce is far from a lock.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed, but he should be considered. Best WR not named Jerry Rice for a while.

[/ QUOTE ]



(Of course Issac gets in, just wanted to post that)

Cody
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:03 PM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

[ QUOTE ]
thoughts on corey dillon?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would put him below Curtis Martin and Tiki Barber. Martin should get in, but Tiki is very borderline. Plus Dillon isn't exactly loved by the media.

Stats are rushing yards, total yards, total td, rushing avg.

Martin: 14,104 - 17,433 - 100 - 4.0
Barber: 10,448 - 15,631 - 67 - 4.7
Dillon: 11,214 - 13,127 - 89 - 4.3

Compared to some other HOFers...

Marshall Faulk: 12,279 - 19,154 - 136 - 4.3
Marcus Allen: 12,234 - 17,645 - 144 - 4.1
Thurman Thomas: 12,074 - 16,532 - 88 - 4.2
Franco Harris: 12,120 - 14,407 - 100 - 4.1
John Riggins: 11,352 - 13,442 - 116 - 3.9
Larry Csonka: 8,081 - 8,901 - 68 - 4.3

Statistically he is very close, maybe a little short, but it's not the baseball HOF. I don't think Dillon gets in. Tiki probably doesn't either, although I would personally vote for Tiki to get in (but not Dillon).

LaDanian Tomlinson: 9,176 - 12,076 - 111 - 4.5.... in six years. Dillon played 10 years. Ye gods.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:08 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

[ QUOTE ]
Bruce has to get in. He is miles ahead of other WR in the HOF.

Isaac Bruce: 887-13376-80
Art Monk: 940-12721-68 <-- widely considered best WR not in HOF
Michael Irvin: 750-11904-65
John Stallworth: 537-8723-63
Lynn Swann: 336-5462-51

Oh, and he's still playing.

LDT will be a lock with one or two more good years, which the author says in the article. He says it's a "formality" and he will be a lock soon.

[/ QUOTE ]

PF:

you are aware of era adjustments, right? I know you are - just confused why you would make such an argument.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:11 PM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
thoughts on corey dillon?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would put him below Curtis Martin and Tiki Barber. Martin should get in, but Tiki is very borderline. Plus Dillon isn't exactly loved by the media.

Stats are rushing yards, total yards, total td, rushing avg.

Martin: 14,104 - 17,433 - 100 - 4.0
Barber: 10,448 - 15,631 - 67 - 4.7
Dillon: 11,214 - 13,127 - 89 - 4.3

Compared to some other HOFers...

Marshall Faulk: 12,279 - 19,154 - 136 - 4.3
Marcus Allen: 12,234 - 17,645 - 144 - 4.1
Thurman Thomas: 12,074 - 16,532 - 88 - 4.2
Franco Harris: 12,120 - 14,407 - 100 - 4.1
John Riggins: 11,352 - 13,442 - 116 - 3.9
Larry Csonka: 8,081 - 8,901 - 68 - 4.3

Statistically he is very close, maybe a little short, but it's not the baseball HOF. I don't think Dillon gets in. Tiki probably doesn't either, although I would personally vote for Tiki to get in (but not Dillon).

LaDanian Tomlinson: 9,176 - 12,076 - 111 - 4.5.... in six years. Dillon played 10 years. Ye gods.

[/ QUOTE ]

1) Those LT2 numbers are so much sicker then I thought they were. I'd imagine they'll taper off some, but my god.

2) None of those guys mentioned seem to be HoF worthy really. Mostly because they have no major accomplishments to tout. The numbers are solid, but is it really enough to push Martin over the edge. I would hope so, but I'd bet even money if not a little less.

Also, with Tiki. Surely leaving when he did, however smart a business/long-term health move, is going to keep him out of the hall. If he'd played a few more years I'd think he'd have a stronger case. That said, his post-NFL position in the media might get him a few extra "buddy-votes".

Cody
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:17 PM
MCS MCS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brooklyn! What!
Posts: 5,447
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

Why is everyone so high on Vinatieri for the HoF? He's a great kicker, but is he really better than other good kickers on Super Bowl winners?

Maybe I'm just bitter because people call him "the best clutch kicker of all time." I think a lot of his clutchness is simply chance; he's been put in the position to kick winning field goals in a couple of big games and has made them. But shouldn't excellent NFL kickers make those kicks routinely?

Plus, in the Super Bowl against Carolina, HE MISSED TWO FIELD GOALS FROM UNDER 37 YARDS. One was blocked, but still.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:21 PM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

[ QUOTE ]
Why is everyone so high on Vinatieri for the HoF? He's a great kicker, but is he really better than other good kickers on Super Bowl winners?

Maybe I'm just bitter because people call him "the best clutch kicker of all time." I think a lot of his clutchness is simply chance; he's been put in the position to kick winning field goals in a couple of big games and has made them. But shouldn't excellent NFL kickers make those kicks routinely?

Plus, in the Super Bowl against Carolina, HE MISSED TWO FIELD GOALS FROM UNDER 37 YARDS. One was blocked, but still.

[/ QUOTE ]

Image. Yeah it's mostly serendipity that he's put in those spots, and certainly the result of 22 players that aren't him, but still, making those kicks on the biggest stage lands you a large amount of name recognition.

Cody
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-30-2007, 08:35 PM
dnh83 dnh83 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 299
Default Re: NFL HOF for active players

Thoughts on Zach Thomas?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.