|
|
#12
06-29-2007, 12:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: big bluff nearly 500bb deep
[ QUOTE ]
also, this is the wrong way to approach the hand i think. its better to look at his range than mine to decide whether or not the bluff is good. [/ QUOTE ] Its also wrong to approach the hand by thinking what he has and then saying well if he has TPTK he will fold because TPTK is not a strong hand and if he has AT he will maybe call because trips is a strong hand. The main point vs any good player is really what you have here. 
|
|
#14
06-29-2007, 12:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: big bluff nearly 500bb deep
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] also, this is the wrong way to approach the hand i think. its better to look at his range than mine to decide whether or not the bluff is good. [/ QUOTE ] Its also wrong to approach the hand by thinking what he has and then saying well if he has TPTK he will fold because TPTK is not a strong hand and if he has AT he will maybe call because trips is a strong hand. The main point vs any good player is really what you have here. [/ QUOTE ] whoops, no wonder i've been losing
|
|
#16
06-29-2007, 01:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: big bluff nearly 500bb deep
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] also, this is the wrong way to approach the hand i think. its better to look at his range than mine to decide whether or not the bluff is good. [/ QUOTE ] Its also wrong to approach the hand by thinking what he has and then saying well if he has TPTK he will fold because TPTK is not a strong hand and if he has AT he will maybe call because trips is a strong hand. The main point vs any good player is really what you have here. [/ QUOTE ] meh? Depends. On bad TAGs, I can usually play the bluffs according to their hands, against good players, like mentioend above, is what your hand looks like. So it depends (as always [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]) No experience with zero to lose, but if he's a thinking player, I'd have to say I dun like it?
|
|
#17
06-29-2007, 01:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: big bluff nearly 500bb deep
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't really like since you're repping exactly 66, maaaybe KT with this. [/ QUOTE ] also, this is the wrong way to approach the hand i think. its better to look at his range than mine to decide whether or not the bluff is good. giving him a range of KT/KQ/AA/AK/draws, only KT will not fold. T is a great card to 3barrel this imo. [/ QUOTE ] It`s obviously good if this was accurate. I just don`t buy it.
|
|
#20
06-29-2007, 01:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: big bluff nearly 500bb deep
i dont like it, and i dont like your logic either, saying its what you put him on determines if he can call or not is awful. If hes the most winning player in an earlier posters db means that he is obv a decent hand reader. Hes looking at your hand and wondering what makes sense.
TT is not in your range, youd 3 bet that preflop. AJ you'd prolly 3 bet too. KT and 66 are the only hands you could have aside from maaaybe JQ spades. Your line although extremly powerful just isnt selling it to me because of the problem with your hand preflop, you showed no strength at all and now because of that your range is incredibly small. If hes good, AK will call here, so will AA, so will a naked Ten, and so will all other hands that already had hit. that being said, congratz on pulling the trigger in this hand, you are indeed a sicko to throw out 180bb's here and it will do wonders for you long run. I just dont like your logic at all
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
