#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
I don't mind this at all
you have non-ace overcards and backdoor flush draw, plus yeti theorem yada yada |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
Wouldnt yeti theorem mean my hand looks like a bluff or am I thinking of something else?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
Who are you, Gilbert Hsu?
JK, I like the play, assuming he is a decent player. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
You have 6 outs. You're going to get called.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
I thought this was generally standard?
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
he doesn't know [censored] bout yeti.. this is good if you think he's folding FD's here
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
Nut flush draw (especially A5s, A4s, 45s, 46s) is doing pretty good against you and is never folding. Pairs from a good player probably weren't raising unless he believed the dynamic was right for inducing a 3-bet bluff/semi-bluff shove, in which case he is calling. All you fold is his air, and possibly his non-nut non-combo flush draws. If you think that's enough, then by all means jam away.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
is 100nl hard enough that you find it necessary to play a big pot with a good player with no hand?
Seriously, if you really want to make a play here, you can float OOP. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
[ QUOTE ]
is 100nl hard enough that you find it necessary to play a big pot with a good player with no hand? Seriously, if you really want to make a play here, you can float OOP. [/ QUOTE ] and do what on the turn? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100nl KQ vs a Reg
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] is 100nl hard enough that you find it necessary to play a big pot with a good player with no hand? Seriously, if you really want to make a play here, you can float OOP. [/ QUOTE ] and do what on the turn? [/ QUOTE ] what card |
|
|