Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-10-2007, 12:00 PM
wrschultz wrschultz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,950
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

Like I say so often, this is a style thing and I think most people here don't understand this. You're very good at picking your spots and mixing up your play and have been doing it for a while. Your hand reading is very good and you've played a variety of styles and understand them all. This is why you're such a big winner, and this is why you understand how to make these types of plays. (I assume you're a big winner, don't have first hand info [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img])

I definitely went through a phase when I was shoving a rediculous amount like this, but lately I've been soooooo tame. Your style is kinda similar to the ActionJeff line of, deciding when your opponent can't call a shove and shoving. I would really suggest that people DONT do this, because you'll [censored] up a lot and lose lots of money. You can't just read a post about a particular play and know how to apply it correctly to your style.

The great thing about doing this ALOT is the fact that people can't just c/c one off over and over. If they know they're going to have to call off their stack with 2nd pair, they aren't often calling a flop bet.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-10-2007, 12:04 PM
Readzie Readzie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 264
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

i disagree, i think they will start calling with second pair more often because you are prone to 3 barell.

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-10-2007, 12:52 PM
Jigsaws Jigsaws is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: pumalicious
Posts: 3,768
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

very interesting, ca. i need to think about this.

i wish there was a way to filter for hands where i bet the river in PT now. in fact, let me see if i can do that with SQL.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-10-2007, 12:54 PM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

[ QUOTE ]
These hands are gross in a vacuum and should be judged in context.

[/ QUOTE ]

i completely disagree. even if we disregard the "range merging" aspect, valuebetting razor thin is the difference between a fat winrate on the way to MSNL and being SSNL4lyfe
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-10-2007, 01:13 PM
Tickner Tickner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,554
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

so basically you cant check call, you cant fold, so "Wtf I dunno what to do I'll just shove and hope for the best"?

I think I see what you are getting at but I'm not sure if the reasoning here is vaild. Shoving these rivers certainly shouldn't be done 100% of the time.

Obv this is only good vs particular opponents at the right times, and I think that is the part of it that you should get deeper into.

Which opponents, and under what circumstances, is this good against?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-10-2007, 01:43 PM
redCashion redCashion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bill Fillmaff Protege
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

[ QUOTE ]
Shoving these rivers certainly shouldn't be done 100% of the time.

Obv this is only good vs particular opponents at the right times, and I think that is the part of it that you should get deeper into.

Which opponents, and under what circumstances, is this good against?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the key here, because talking about a concept that has this much variance without getting into detail about when, why, and how often you are applying it doesn't mean alot. Btw, what is your river and overall aggression factor when you play this way?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-10-2007, 01:49 PM
Redgrape Redgrape is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 816
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

I think these hands are exploiting good regs who will think your bluffing in these situations. I understand your reasoning but i feel like flat weak value bets are better here barring a read that the players will call bluffy lines.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-10-2007, 01:57 PM
mikechops mikechops is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,168
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

I think 1 and 2 are pretty bad. I'd agree we probably ahead in both hands but can't see getting called by worse or folding better hands -(well maybe a nervous AJ in 1? but that's real thin).

Was 3 a mono flop? If so I think it is spew, but otherwise I like it depending on the opponent.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-10-2007, 04:17 PM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

Hey CAterp good post. I'm trying to incorporate this into my game. Is this a good example?

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)

SB: $141.20
BB: $23.65
UTG: $62.55
<font color="black">Hero (CO): $49.25</font>
BTN: $55.65

<font color="black">Preflop:</font> Hero is dealt J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players)
UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $2.00</font>, BTN folds, SB calls $1.75, BB calls $1.50

<font color="black">Flop:</font> ($6) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 Players)
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $5.00</font>, SB calls $5.00, BB folds

<font color="black">Turn:</font> ($16) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $12.50</font>, SB calls $12.50

<font color="black">River:</font> ($41) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets all-in for $29.75</font>,
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-10-2007, 04:27 PM
forshure forshure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UIUC
Posts: 1,054
Default Re: theory: \"the showdown tax\"

No. Your hand is far stronger then any hand he shoves on any of those rivers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.