|
|
#12
06-10-2007, 10:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Paul
[ QUOTE ]
ron paul is on cspan right now [/ QUOTE ] Thanks. Too bad it's from Tuesday. Were it live, I'd call in and ask him about Friday's hearing. 
|
|
#13
06-10-2007, 11:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ron Pauls best chance: www.unity08.org check them out. obg [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. There's also the possibility he'd run as a Libertarian, as he did in 1988. That's probably more likely, as he's already a member of the party. Also, Libertarians typcially get on all 50 state ballots. If he does run as a Libertarian, it will probably be their best result to date. I hope he runs. We could use the voice. [/ QUOTE ] No, he has already said he won't run if he doesn't get the republican nomination.
|
|
#14
06-11-2007, 03:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
anyone who wears DUAL glasses cant be trusted. End of story
|
|
#15
06-11-2007, 09:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Ron Pauls best chance: www.unity08.org check them out. obg [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. There's also the possibility he'd run as a Libertarian, as he did in 1988. That's probably more likely, as he's already a member of the party. Also, Libertarians typcially get on all 50 state ballots. If he does run as a Libertarian, it will probably be their best result to date. I hope he runs. We could use the voice. [/ QUOTE ] No, he has already said he won't run if he doesn't get the republican nomination. [/ QUOTE ] He said he won't run independent.
|
|
#16
06-11-2007, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
[ QUOTE ]
Do we have a collection of links that we can use to spam people with? [/ QUOTE ] politics thread
|
|
#17
06-12-2007, 01:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
Rumor going around is that Paul raised $5 million in the last two months. That would move him from a 3rd tier candidate to a 2nd tier candidate. It's not enough to win, but its enough to make some noise.
|
|
#18
06-12-2007, 03:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] give it up, paul has no chance [/ QUOTE ] Many of us vote for people we support, rather than simply lining up behind the front-runner. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but instead of wasting your time and effort pick one of the big 4 that will help poker the most and go with it. Instead of spamming crappy ron paul stuff
|
|
#19
06-12-2007, 07:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
He was on Realtime with Bill Maher again on May 25th and Maher was being all sorts of positive about him. This is the second time since March he was on Mahers show and another week he mentioned Paul in a very positive manner. Not to mention Mahers 99% liberal audience was VERY enthusiastic about Paul. He had a good interview on The Daily Show too.
I think if hell froze over and he managed to get the Republican nomination he could get quite a few liberals to vote for him. Conservatives, Moderates and Liberals are all sick of the BS that goes on in D.C. and Paul is the only candidate on either side who actually has a track record that backs up his claims.
|
|
#20
06-12-2007, 07:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ron Paul
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] give it up, paul has no chance [/ QUOTE ] Many of us vote for people we support, rather than simply lining up behind the front-runner. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but instead of wasting your time and effort pick one of the big 4 that will help poker the most and go with it. Instead of spamming crappy ron paul stuff [/ QUOTE ] That's why there's never change. I believe in Paul's message, so I'll support him. Barry Goldwater had no chance in 1964, but the movement he started led to Reagan's victory in 1980. As for the "big four", who do you suggest we get behind? None help poker. None are true conservatives in that none believe in limited government. None believe in the Constitution. We don't have to be sheep and vote for front-runners, you know. I'd like to send the Republican Party a message that rank-and-file Republicans don't like this big government party. Voting for Paul helps set this in motion, and it helps poker at the same time.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
