#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
18/6 wtf
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
18/6 - too tight? too loose? not enough pfr?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
1.raise more preflop
2.call less with marginal hands 3.play more aggro 4.pick one limit porbably nl400 5.dont run bad(most important) 6.profit |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
This is defiantly variance, as you can see in the last 3,000 hands there are two huge -$400 downswings within 100 hands which account for about half of all the losses. Most likely was just bad luck at the wrong time (while you were playing higher limits).
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
10k hands? thats like 1 days worth
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
tx all. ill try that. ha and ill bring a bigger sample next time . [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
this thread is awesome
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
[ QUOTE ]
18/6 - too tight? too loose? not enough pfr? [/ QUOTE ] your PFR is like half what mine is |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
Play more 50NL obv. No one can adjust to your 36/3 style.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance or bad play-SSL(graph)
Looks like 57% won at showdown is running pretty sick hot.
|
|
|